台灣生技的未來==> how about FDA drug-diagnostic codevelop

看板Bioindustry (生物科技)作者 (stanley)時間20年前 (2005/12/26 22:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/1
※ 引述《echo (KEEP WALKING)》之銘言: : 不好好為人民的用藥把關,反而為產業界著想,這實非人民之福。 : 扯的遠了~ 台灣生技製藥產業的未來在哪? 在各位的壯志雄心之中。 對不起,小弟打字慢,to put it in English Why not try recently draft from FDA April 2005 April 8, 2005 FDA published a Drug Diagnostic Co-development Concept Paper http://www.fda.gov/cder/genomics/pharmacoconceptfn.pdf Taiwan should put focus on diangostic kits less effort and capital,easier to success, comparing the biomarkers discoveries and labeling new drug For example, irresa (EGFR-TKI) its responsive mutations (exon 18-21, caltalytic kinase binding) are recongized and confirmed. Even its resistence mutations are also reported (NEJM, 2005). In view of long listed EGFR-TKIs in the phrase II, III, and even downstream inhibitors in trails and development (JCO, 2005), there is considerable clinical demand in selecting optial drug for right patient, i.e. pharmacogenomics or personalized medicine (molecular typing of cancer as clinical antibiotics sensitivies tests) Given example of FDA appoved first phamacogenetic diagnostic kits (Roche and Affymetrix) together with FDA MAQC project schedule (translating microarray into clinical practice in end of 2007 or early 2008) and FDA multiplex tests draft (2003 Feb), pharmacogenomics or personalized medicine (highly racial difference) is going to realized in the near future. Comments are welcomed. Contacts: Stanley CY Peck, MD (heading for further Ph.D) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.137.67.113
文章代碼(AID): #13h_xtS8 (Bioindustry)
文章代碼(AID): #13h_xtS8 (Bioindustry)