[分析] 請問一題ARGUEMENT

看板GRE (GRE入學考試)作者 (老實人至上)時間17年前 (2008/08/17 17:58), 編輯推噓4(406)
留言10則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
The following appeared in a newsletter about education policy. "The average annual earnings of high school dropouts are significantly less than the average annual earnings of high school graduates. To address this problem, the state governor has proposed that the state should establish free vocational training programs for high school dropouts. But the availability of such programs would probably encourage some students who would otherwise have graduated to drop out in order to pursue vocational training. Hence the proposed programs would lower, not raise, the average earning potential of young people. Therefore, the state should not establish the vocational training programs but should instead focus on improving academic programs in our high schools." 今天寫到這題,實在想不太出來他的缺點 請問有哪位大大有反駁的好點子嗎 -- | | |\● |\| 向爬呀老實人 | \ | -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.173.199.40

08/17 18:10, , 1F
1.學生不一定會故意輟學去訓練 2.沒有
08/17 18:10, 1F

08/17 18:12, , 2F
關係(沒證據顯示訓練跟降低收入有關)
08/17 18:12, 2F

08/17 18:14, , 3F
退學學生比畢業生少,所以表示高中課程
08/17 18:14, 3F

08/17 18:15, , 4F
應該還好(反駁結論)需要用訓練來照顧
08/17 18:15, 4F

08/17 18:15, , 5F
到那些退學的學生!(個人淺見:P)
08/17 18:15, 5F

08/17 18:30, , 6F
沒有證據保證訓練能要拉高輟學生收入
08/17 18:30, 6F

08/17 18:30, , 7F
學生不會放棄低風險高利益的高中學歷
08/17 18:30, 7F

08/18 01:52, , 8F
即使將高中課程改進 也不一定會減少輟學
08/18 01:52, 8F

08/18 01:52, , 9F
因為沒證據顯示輟學是由於課程所導致
08/18 01:52, 9F

08/18 02:30, , 10F
輟學學生未必會參加訓練
08/18 02:30, 10F
文章代碼(AID): #18f_PVMO (GRE)
文章代碼(AID): #18f_PVMO (GRE)