Re: [問題] 請問一題填空 [updated]

看板GRE (GRE入學考試)作者chiuj時間16年前 (2009/08/25 17:46)推噓1(1推 0噓 2→)

留言3則, 2人參與討論串1/1

---網路找到的方老師看法--- http://tinyurl.com/n4mska 為甚麼supremacy .. suppression of不行? Without前後應該是相輔相成的關係,缺少後面的東西所以會導致戰爭, 所以有了autonomy 卻少了law就不足了! => absolute autonomy = without any accountability 不必負責 ---網路找到的方老師看法2--- http://tinyurl.com/lssrdm (B) supremacy優越性 .. suppression of --> 填充題不可無窮擴充想像力 ---以下為個人解題看法--- 另外一題填空 According to one political theorist, a regime that has its goal absolute____, without any ___ law or principle, has declared war on justice. --> 改寫： a regime that has its goal absolute____ has declared war on justice, without any ___ law or principle. 想法一：無轉折或對照，整題談的是單一觀念想法二：從第二空格解：向正義宣戰的政權是 ---> 壞 without suppression of law: -->沒有壓制法令 (好) without accountability to law ：沒有對法律負有責任 (壞) 想到這裡便可答題了想法三： autonomy： [LM] freedom that a place or an organization has to govern or control itself absolute autonomy [=freedom] = without accountability [=responsibility] 想法四： supremacy本身就含有絕對的意涵，用absolute修飾很奇怪請高手指正（我是半猜對的XD） 1. supremacy suppression of 2. autonomy accountability to -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.42.215.25