[反義] CAT和宋昊答案不同的(請大家幫我看看)

看板GRE (GRE入學考試)作者 (submarine)時間16年前 (2010/02/03 19:37), 編輯推噓2(202)
留言4則, 1人參與, 最新討論串1/1
讀一些題發現cat和宋昊兩者有些答案不同 我查了一下M-W ,但還是有些不確定,希望大家幫我看看我的判斷有沒錯 1.concerted:?? individual deviced (CAT) meant to obstruct (宋昊) 困惑:concerted 有協同完成的意思? MW: a : mutually contrived or agreed on <a concerted effort> b : performed in unison <concerted artillery fire> 結論:基於紅字的部份,感覺MW比較強調共同,所以應該是CAT的答案正確 --------------------------------------------------- 2.grandiloquent:?? colloquial secretive 困惑:grandiloquent 就是吹虛,招搖的感覺? MW: grandiloquent: a lofty, extravagantly colorful, pompous, or bombastic style, manner, or quality especially in language colloquial: 1 : of or relating to conversation : conversational 2 : used in or characteristic of familiar and informal conversation; also : unacceptably informal b : using conversational style 結論:colloquial在mw的定義沒有明顯跟grandiloquent相反,而pompous、bombastic 反而有和secretive相反的味道,所以是宋昊答案正確 ----------------------------------------------------- 3.inchoate:?? explicit enduring MW: inchoate being only partly in existence or operation : incipient; especially : imperfectly formed or formulated explicit fully developed or formulated <an explicit plan> 結論:CAT的答案正確 ------------------------------------------------------ 4.obsession:?? perfunctory interest intense disgust 困惑:obsession是有強烈愛好的味道? MW: obsession: a persistent disturbing preoccupation with an often unreasonable idea or feeling; broadly : compelling motivation <an obsession with profits> 結論:mw定義中又有persistent 和perfunctory反義 同時又有compelling和disgust/interest反義 CAT兩個字都有和定義反義所以選CAT的答案??? ------------------------------------------------------- 5.fluent:glib=?? humorous:wry meticulous:finicky MW: glib marked by ease and fluency in speaking or writing often to the point of being insincere or deceitful wry cleverly and often ironically or grimly humorous 困惑: 就cat的答案來說: glib是帶有貶義的fluent wry是帶有ironically grimly的humorous 兩者感覺很合理 但又可以解釋說fluent:glib是程度關係,那就和meticulous:finicky能對上 結論:?? 我也不知道 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.141.206.21

02/03 22:50, , 1F
我覺得 meticulous:finicky 只有同義關係
02/03 22:50, 1F

02/03 22:54, , 2F
老方講解這題時,有說這題關係比較特別,不單只是程
02/03 22:54, 2F

02/03 22:56, , 3F
度,太過 fluent 以至於讓人覺得 glib (over+bad)
02/03 22:56, 3F

02/03 22:57, , 4F
我的印象是這樣 = =,希望有幫到你
02/03 22:57, 4F
文章代碼(AID): #1BQM0EUO (GRE)
文章代碼(AID): #1BQM0EUO (GRE)