[字彙] 邏輯問題請教
我是剛接觸GRE的新手
最近開始練習邏輯題目
但是做了十題只對一題
非常沮喪
請問大家是如何練習邏輯的呢?
能否用下面兩題示範一下大家的邏輯思維
1. Editorial:
About 20 percent of professors at Torellia National University were not
educated in Torellia. The average pay of professors at the university who
were educated in Torellia is about 10 percent lower than that of professors
with comparable levels of training and experience who were educated outside
Torellia. These figures clearly indicate the existence of a university
policy, though probably an unwritten one, of favoring foreign-educated
professors over those educated in Torellia when determining salaries
Which of the following, if true,most seriously undermines the editorial's
conclusion ?
(A) The salaries of professors at the university are increasing more
slowly than the salaries of people with comparable levels of training and
experience employed by corporations.
(B) The business school of the university, where most of the professors
who were educated outside Torellia teach, must pay high salaries to its
faculty to compete with salaries available to them from corporations.
(C )The benefits other than salary offered to the university’s
professors are about the same for professors educated in Torellia as for
those not educated in Torellia.
(D) The university has an explicit policy setting broad salary ranges for
professors at all levels of experience.
(E )Most of the professors at the university who were educated outside
Torellia are native-born citizens of Torellia.
這題我覺得五個選項都無法破壞社論的結論
請問為什麼答案是B
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.
Argyropolis' subway platforms were built to accommodate eight-car trains,
but no trains longer than six xars have ever been used. Subway overcrowding
has recently prompted officials to propose using eight-car trains, but for
the platforms to accommodate such trains, the trains must be stopped with a
degree of precision that train drivers cannot reliably achieve now nor be
retrained to achieve. Therefore, overcrowding cannot be eliminated simply by
using longer trains, given that____________.
Which of the following, if true, most logically completes the argument?
(A)far fewer people used the subway system when it was built 25 years ago
than use it today
(B)seven-car trains cannot carry enough passengers to eliminate the
overcrowding
(C)subway officials have not seriously considered any means of eliminating
overcrowding other than using longer trains
(D)nine-car trains cannot be accommodated at the existing platforms
(E)the current overcrowding, although frustrating to passengers, does not
violate any subway safety laws
我這題我選C 因為我認為倘若政府不考慮其他增加車廂以外的方法
那麼單純增加車廂的這個方法無法解決人潮問題
但是答案卻是B
能否解釋為什麼我對於C的解釋是錯的
謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 163.26.36.158
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/GRE/M.1464843037.A.D6D.html
→
06/02 14:33, , 1F
06/02 14:33, 1F
→
06/02 14:33, , 2F
06/02 14:33, 2F
→
06/02 14:33, , 3F
06/02 14:33, 3F
→
06/02 14:33, , 4F
06/02 14:33, 4F
→
06/02 14:38, , 5F
06/02 14:38, 5F
→
06/02 14:38, , 6F
06/02 14:38, 6F
→
06/02 14:38, , 7F
06/02 14:38, 7F
→
06/02 14:38, , 8F
06/02 14:38, 8F
→
06/02 14:39, , 9F
06/02 14:39, 9F
→
06/02 14:39, , 10F
06/02 14:39, 10F
推
06/04 01:17, , 11F
06/04 01:17, 11F
→
06/06 17:24, , 12F
06/06 17:24, 12F
→
06/06 17:24, , 13F
06/06 17:24, 13F
→
06/06 17:25, , 14F
06/06 17:25, 14F
→
06/06 17:25, , 15F
06/06 17:25, 15F
→
06/06 22:07, , 16F
06/06 22:07, 16F
→
06/06 22:12, , 17F
06/06 22:12, 17F
→
06/06 22:12, , 18F
06/06 22:12, 18F
→
06/06 22:12, , 19F
06/06 22:12, 19F
→
06/06 22:12, , 20F
06/06 22:12, 20F
→
06/06 22:12, , 21F
06/06 22:12, 21F
GRE 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章