PTT職涯區 / IELTS (IELTS雅思)

[問題] 新平行閱讀法-Sydney 2000 Oplympics

看板IELTS (IELTS雅思)作者 (幹嘛)時間11年前 (2014/05/31 18:11), 編輯推噓7(7推 0噓 21→)
留言28則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/1
閱讀此段文章，但內容和文法結構不太理解，望請大大們解惑!!! 謝謝大家 There may have been some consolation in the fact that the bid came in $1 million below the revised budget and $5 million below the original budget of $29 million formulated in mid-1991. However, the final cost was the considerable sum of $ 24 million, the bulk of which was paid for by corporate and community contributions, merchandising, licensing, and the proceeds of lotteries, with the NSW Government, which had originally been willing to spend up to $10 million, contributing some $ 2 million. The Federal Government's grant of $ 5 million meant, in effect, that the Sydney bid was financed by every Australian taxpayer. 想請問黃色句子部分: 1. 付錢的是corporate and community contributions， 支付的項目是merchandising, licensing, and the proceeds of lotteries 的意思嗎? 2. with the NSW Government, which had originally been willing to spend up to $10 million, contributing some $ 2 million a) 這句是NSW Gov.貢獻了$2 m，而他原本是願意花$10 m的意思嗎? b) 為什麼some 和$ 2 million中間不用介系詞啊? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 58.114.240.38 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/IELTS/M.1401531114.A.085.html
推
05/31 20:09, , 1F
沒有書看不到顏色呀，你要不要拍個照
05/31 20:09, 1F
→
05/31 20:24, , 2F
她不是已經編輯成黃色了@@
05/31 20:24, 2F
推
05/31 20:26, , 3F
used before numbers to mean ‘approximately’
05/31 20:26, 3F
推
05/31 20:27, , 4F
手機看不到 sorry
05/31 20:27, 4F
→
05/31 23:27, , 5F
Hi S大，大概是我電腦版面顯示的第四行:the bulk of which
05/31 23:27, 5F
→
05/31 23:28, , 6F
開始到$ 2 million結束的這段話~因為我不知道怎麼上傳圖@@
05/31 23:28, 6F
推
06/01 00:48, , 7F
錢來自c&c cont, merch, lic, lott, nsw gov ($2 only)
06/01 00:48, 7F
→
06/01 00:50, , 8F
全部加起來 = $24m, 然後這少於原budget$29m by $5m
06/01 00:50, 8F
→
06/01 00:53, , 9F
最後少的$5m聯邦政府出，等於所有的納稅人都貢獻了
06/01 00:53, 9F
→
06/01 00:54, , 10F
some $2m = 大約 $2m
06/01 00:54, 10F
→
06/01 00:55, , 11F
希望有幫到~
06/01 00:55, 11F
→
06/01 22:23, , 12F
咦,是說總支出是24m,那些零零總總付了19m,Federal gov付了
06/01 22:23, 12F
→
06/01 22:23, , 13F
5m，total=24m。 還是說總支出29m,零零總總的付了24m，
06/01 22:23, 13F
→
06/01 22:24, , 14F
Federal gov付了5m的意思啊? 有點搞不清楚是哪一種了@@
06/01 22:24, 14F
推
06/02 00:40, , 15F
:沒看過全文，只從你貼的部分看起來...一開始預算=29
06/02 00:40, 15F
推
06/02 00:44, , 16F
那兩個政府nsw, federal 是陷阱吧
06/02 00:44, 16F
→
06/02 00:46, , 17F
nsw=省，federal=聯邦=全國。聯邦貼5=所有納稅人合力貼5
06/02 00:46, 17F
→
06/03 03:06, , 18F
我上傳照片成功了http://ppt.cc/Ebd3
06/03 03:06, 18F
→
06/03 03:08, , 19F
有講到錢的只有前三段，只是不知道意思是是:聯邦的5m含在
06/03 03:08, 19F
→
06/03 03:09, , 20F
全部24m;還是含在全部29m (還是文意就是沒交代?)
06/03 03:09, 20F
→
06/03 03:09, , 21F
還有一個地方好奇怪，A段寫全部cost 960m，C段又寫全部cost
06/03 03:09, 21F
→
06/03 03:12, , 22F
24m，差好多喔，我再補上全部文章好了，真歹勢@@"
06/03 03:12, 22F
→
06/03 03:16, , 23F
06/03 03:16, 23F
推
06/03 09:42, , 24F
呵呵有趣的文章,960是所有的花費,24是投標的花費
06/03 09:42, 24F
→
06/03 09:45, , 25F
然後聯邦給5,省給2,剩下的bulk是c&c cont...etc給的
06/03 09:45, 25F
→
06/03 09:48, , 26F
投標的budget @1991=29,@revision time(時間沒提)=25
06/03 09:48, 26F
→
06/03 09:51, , 27F
所以說consolation令人安慰,因為投標費有比較原計畫少
06/03 09:51, 27F
→
06/03 14:18, , 28F
喔喔喔!!!了解!!!超級感謝sayhitome大!!!(跪拜)
06/03 14:18, 28F
‣ 更多 gammer 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1JYQhg25 (IELTS)
IELTS 近期熱門文章
更多 近期熱門文章 >>
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
更多 即時熱門文章 >>
‣ 更多 gammer 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1JYQhg25 (IELTS)