[問題] 各位大大!
小弟有幸獲得某期刊revise的機會!
可是現在有個問題相當困擾我!!
其中有個reviewer問到一個問題
是如此:(直接引用)
1.Does author have the evidence (Cross sectional FESEM or TEM images) for
schematic structure of device in Figure 1.How to know the monolyaer cover
the nanorod such a good uniformity?
而後試著拍TEM
來證明表面上的確有nanoparticle的存在
但是採用磨試片的方式去做,因此看到的結果幾乎不是像reviewer所說的那樣...
後來想採FIB的方式去做,但是可能要花上一筆不小的經費....
教授的意思是希望可以省下這個經費
試著用其它的方式,來間接的證明上方有particle的存在!!
想請問各位大大,如果是按照如此的方式去做....
reviewer會接受嗎?
因為聽說學長之前好像也是在revise的時候沒有補TEM的圖最後被reject.....>0<"
這是我第一篇有機會可以上的paper,希望一次就上不要再被reject....
煩請大家給我點意見,謝謝!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.102.175
推
09/24 10:30, , 1F
09/24 10:30, 1F
→
09/24 10:31, , 2F
09/24 10:31, 2F
→
09/24 10:32, , 3F
09/24 10:32, 3F
推
09/24 11:58, , 4F
09/24 11:58, 4F
推
09/24 12:51, , 5F
09/24 12:51, 5F
→
09/24 12:52, , 6F
09/24 12:52, 6F
推
09/24 12:56, , 7F
09/24 12:56, 7F
→
09/24 12:56, , 8F
09/24 12:56, 8F
推
09/24 13:01, , 9F
09/24 13:01, 9F
推
09/24 15:29, , 10F
09/24 15:29, 10F
推
09/24 15:30, , 11F
09/24 15:30, 11F
→
09/24 15:32, , 12F
09/24 15:32, 12F
→
09/24 15:33, , 13F
09/24 15:33, 13F
→
09/24 19:17, , 14F
09/24 19:17, 14F
→
09/24 19:18, , 15F
09/24 19:18, 15F
→
09/24 19:18, , 16F
09/24 19:18, 16F
→
09/24 19:18, , 17F
09/24 19:18, 17F
→
09/24 19:20, , 18F
09/24 19:20, 18F
→
09/24 19:20, , 19F
09/24 19:20, 19F
→
09/24 19:22, , 20F
09/24 19:22, 20F
→
09/24 19:23, , 21F
09/24 19:23, 21F
→
09/24 19:23, , 22F
09/24 19:23, 22F
→
09/25 21:32, , 23F
09/25 21:32, 23F
→
09/26 14:36, , 24F
09/26 14:36, 24F
推
09/27 19:17, , 25F
09/27 19:17, 25F
PhD 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章