[心得] R2被reject....
也不知道從何說起
反正還是覺得一整個爛透了
話說在去年7/27投了一個生物領域期刊 (IF：5.44)
審了好久好久到了今年初，終於收到了 Decision Letter
兩個reviewer跟好多問題，判定為 major revise
在辛苦回覆revise完，過了一個月多，收到了R2通知信
仔細看了一下覺得很奇怪，兩個reviewer都說OK。
信的最下方出現了reviewer 3，至少這情形是自己沒遇過的，
問了9題，英文部分佔了3題，花了一番時間回復後，想說應該
是有機會了吧，結果今天早上收到的信，簡直讓我傻眼：
Dear XXX,
Thank you for revising and resubmitting your manuscript. The editors
appreciate your efforts to satisfy the concerns of the reviewers and the
requirements of the journal. We are sorry to inform you that the consensus
of the editors was that your manuscript did not attain high enough priority
for publication in the journal. 以下還是一堆制式REJECT的台詞...
搞了快一年，連個中肯reject的理由都沒有，就讓我上路了
假如說我的文章不夠期刊水平，那當初直接reject就好
況且R1的兩位reviewer已經說OK
結果還是REJECT
唉～
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.114.123.169
推
05/10 17:58, , 1F
05/10 17:58, 1F
→
05/10 17:58, , 2F
05/10 17:58, 2F
推
05/10 17:58, , 3F
05/10 17:58, 3F
→
05/10 17:59, , 4F
05/10 17:59, 4F
→
05/10 18:00, , 5F
05/10 18:00, 5F
推
05/10 18:14, , 6F
05/10 18:14, 6F
推
05/10 18:39, , 7F
05/10 18:39, 7F
→
05/10 18:39, , 8F
05/10 18:39, 8F
→
05/10 18:40, , 9F
05/10 18:40, 9F
→
05/10 18:40, , 10F
05/10 18:40, 10F
推
05/10 18:55, , 11F
05/10 18:55, 11F
→
05/10 19:39, , 12F
05/10 19:39, 12F
推
05/10 20:20, , 13F
05/10 20:20, 13F
→
05/10 20:43, , 14F
05/10 20:43, 14F
→
05/10 21:10, , 15F
05/10 21:10, 15F
→
05/10 21:11, , 16F
05/10 21:11, 16F
→
05/10 21:11, , 17F
05/10 21:11, 17F
→
05/10 21:12, , 18F
05/10 21:12, 18F
→
05/10 21:12, , 19F
05/10 21:12, 19F
推
05/10 21:24, , 20F
05/10 21:24, 20F
推
05/10 22:12, , 21F
05/10 22:12, 21F
推
05/10 22:22, , 22F
05/10 22:22, 22F
→
05/10 22:23, , 23F
05/10 22:23, 23F
推
05/10 23:39, , 24F
05/10 23:39, 24F
→
05/11 03:01, , 25F
05/11 03:01, 25F
→
05/11 05:46, , 26F
05/11 05:46, 26F
→
05/11 07:39, , 27F
05/11 07:39, 27F
推
05/11 14:19, , 28F
05/11 14:19, 28F
推
05/12 00:41, , 29F
05/12 00:41, 29F
推
05/12 10:27, , 30F
05/12 10:27, 30F
PhD 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章