[討論] for的用法

看板TOEIC (TOEIC多益)作者時間11年前 (2014/09/13 03:02), 編輯推噓4(4012)
留言16則, 6人參與, 最新討論串1/1
寫國學黃金認證閱讀第6回 第198題看到的一個選項句子 Job opportunities are not available for work with focus group. 這裡的for後面為什麼是接原形work,而不是working呢?? 是跟後面的with有關嗎?? 感謝回答.. -- -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.173.62.29 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/TOEIC/M.1410548528.A.DCC.html

09/13 07:32, , 1F
work也可以當名詞!!!!
09/13 07:32, 1F

09/13 09:26, , 2F
想成程式語法 害我以為走錯版XD
09/13 09:26, 2F

09/13 11:51, , 3F
有想過是名詞,但總覺得不太順,所以這裡的用法是
09/13 11:51, 3F

09/13 11:51, , 4F
當for的受詞然後再接with focus group
09/13 11:51, 4F

09/13 11:53, , 5F
而不是for(頓)working with focus group ? 這樣
09/13 11:53, 5F

09/13 11:53, , 6F
嗎?
09/13 11:53, 6F

09/13 14:18, , 7F
Work名詞+1
09/13 14:18, 7F

09/13 18:16, , 8F
work(which are)with……?
09/13 18:16, 8F

09/14 01:05, , 9F
With後面那串應該是在形容work
09/14 01:05, 9F

09/14 03:53, , 10F
你為什麼為覺得用''work''會不順昵?
09/14 03:53, 10F

09/14 10:39, , 11F
想過後,如果是for work(頓)with focus group的
09/14 10:39, 11F

09/14 10:39, , 12F
話就可以了
09/14 10:39, 12F

09/14 10:41, , 13F
但當初想的是not for(頓)working with foocus gro
09/14 10:41, 13F

09/14 10:41, , 14F
up…所以才疑惑為何不是working? 但在這若用working
09/14 10:41, 14F

09/14 10:41, , 15F
也是通的吧?!
09/14 10:41, 15F

09/14 17:39, , 16F
嗯working也是可以
09/14 17:39, 16F
文章代碼(AID): #1K4qCmtC (TOEIC)
文章代碼(AID): #1K4qCmtC (TOEIC)