Re: [問題] IRR與NPV的比較
看板Accounting (會計)作者aaaaaakoyasu (密爾瓦基的寒冬。)時間16年前 (2009/11/09 01:32)推噓2(2推 0噓 17→)留言19則, 4人參與討論串2/4 (看更多)
不好意思
我剛才才看到原PO推文說問題是在英文
我大概翻譯一下 原PO應該就知道答案了
因為我會計沒有用中文學過 很多專業名詞的中文都不懂 所以專業名詞還是用英文表示 :)
※ 引述《willie1987 (威力是也)》之銘言：
: 題目:
: The net present value (NPV) method and internal rate of return (IRR) model
: are used to analyze capital expenditures.The IRR model,as contrasted with the
: NPV model
NPV和IRR都是用來分析capital expenditures，而IRR和NPV不同的地方是：
: (A)is considered inferior because it fails to caculate compo-unded interest
^^^^^^^^^^^
compounded
: rate.
IRR較不好是因為IRR無法計算複率
: (B)is a discounted cash flow model while NPV model is not
IRR是用discounted cash flow 而NPV不是
: (C)almost always gives a different decision than does the NPV method as to
: the acceptability of a given proposal
要不要接受proposal，IRR給的結論和NPV總是不同
: (D)assumes that the rate of return on the reinvestment of the cash proceeds
: is at the indicated rate of return of the project analyzed rather than at
: the discount rate used
這句話直翻的話太拗口了，大意是說IRR算出來是一個rate of return，
而不是用discount rate算出答案後去作結論我要不要接受這project。
: (E)none of the above
以上皆非
: 答案:(D) 我不太懂這題的觀念,請會的人教教我吧!拜託了~感恩!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 72.128.105.213
→
11/09 01:37, , 1F
11/09 01:37, 1F
→
11/09 01:43, , 2F
11/09 01:43, 2F
→
11/09 01:44, , 3F
11/09 01:44, 3F
→
11/09 01:44, , 4F
11/09 01:44, 4F
推
11/09 02:14, , 5F
11/09 02:14, 5F
推
11/09 02:32, , 6F
11/09 02:32, 6F
→
11/09 02:33, , 7F
11/09 02:33, 7F
→
11/09 02:33, , 8F
11/09 02:33, 8F
→
11/09 02:34, , 9F
11/09 02:34, 9F
→
11/09 02:34, , 10F
11/09 02:34, 10F
→
11/09 02:45, , 11F
11/09 02:45, 11F
→
11/09 03:58, , 12F
11/09 03:58, 12F
→
11/09 03:59, , 13F
11/09 03:59, 13F
→
11/09 04:00, , 14F
11/09 04:00, 14F
→
11/09 04:01, , 15F
11/09 04:01, 15F
→
11/09 04:04, , 16F
11/09 04:04, 16F
→
11/09 04:05, , 17F
11/09 04:05, 17F
→
11/09 04:05, , 18F
11/09 04:05, 18F
→
11/10 05:28, , 19F
11/10 05:28, 19F
討論串 (同標題文章)
Accounting 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章