[名人] Joseph Louis François Bertrand(1822 …

看板Economics (經濟學)作者 (.)時間18年前 (2008/04/29 21:44), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 Math 看板] 作者: fizeau (.) 看板: Math 標題: [名人] Joseph Louis François Bertrand(1822-1900) 時間: Tue Apr 29 21:39:52 2008 http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/bertrand.htm A prominent French mathematician, Joseph Bertrand studied and taught at the É cole Polytéchnique in Paris. From 1862 to 1900, he held a chair at the prestigious Collège de France. He was also a member of the influential Acadé mie des Sciences. For philosophical reasons, Bertrand was generally opposed to the application of mathematical reasoning to psychology, sensations, and other elusive components of human behavior. As a result, he was very dismissive of Léon Walras's pretentious claim that economics was merely a branch of applied mathematics. As he put it once to Walras, it was like "undertaking the study of hydraulics with muddy liquids." In 1875, as a referee for the Revue des Deux Mondes, Bertrand rejected a Walras paper (later published in the Giornale) on this topic. In 1877, Walras sent Bertrand a draft of his Thé orie mathématique de la richesse sociale, but Bertrand did not reply. In 1883, Bertrand finally decided to publish a review of Walras's book in the Journal des Savants. Although negative in general, Bertrand's review had some kind words for Walras. Bertrand disputed the realism of the tâ tonnement process and argued that out-of-equilibrium exchange must be allowed and thus price indeterminacy. He also disputed the utility-maximization hypothesis, arguing that merchants were mainly interested in money profits, not utility. In that same 1883 Journal des Savant article, Bertrand took the opportunity to also review the long-neglected 1838 work of Augustin Cournot. Here, Bertrand's assessment was damning. He argued that Cournot's work deserved to be neglected because its algebraic argument was faulty and that, as a result, Cournot had reached the wrong conclusions on questions like the incidence of tax on monopoly price, the determinancy of duopoly price and the effects of free trade. On the constructive side, Bertrand (1883) "reworked" the Cournot duopoly model with prices, rather than quantities, as the strategic variables. In this case, Bertrand showed, prices will be driven immediately down to the perfectly competitive solution. Later on, F.Y. Edgeworth (1897) drew attention to the limitations of Bertrand's solution, in particular that he relied on firms having no capacity constraints and thus operating under constant marginal cost. In its stead, Edgeworth introduced capacity constraints and showed that the solution was indeterminate. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 163.25.118.134 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 163.25.118.134
文章代碼(AID): #185oPCro (Economics)
文章代碼(AID): #185oPCro (Economics)