[文法] could be v-ed...would?

看板Eng-Class (英文板)作者 (獨孤求噓-風青羊)時間12年前 (2013/08/11 02:32), 編輯推噓3(306)
留言9則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/1
However, the KMT insists that a special military court be established under the Ministry of Justice since expertise on military affairs would be required for prosecutors and judges who handle such cases, Lai said. 為什麼不能用being established? 我的想法是從would之前都是一個子句 這樣不行嗎? 感謝回答~ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.31.135.68

08/11 03:22, , 1F
"我的想法是...."--> 有多個子句
08/11 03:22, 1F

08/11 03:23, , 2F
the KMT insists(主要子句) that+(that引導的子句) ...
08/11 03:23, 2F

08/11 03:23, , 3F
since (since引導的子句) ....
08/11 03:23, 3F

08/11 03:23, , 6F
特別是 (4) 裡頭有提到 insist
08/11 03:23, 6F

08/11 03:24, , 7F
因為一開始的動詞insist,S+insist... ,S+(should)+
08/11 03:24, 7F

08/11 03:25, , 8F
原形動詞
08/11 03:25, 8F
喔喔 所以如果前面假設是DECLARE的話 是不是就應該要用BEING? ※ 編輯: chevalierxd 來自: 61.31.135.68 (08/11 03:44)

08/11 14:15, , 9F
這樣的話,文法架構變得很怪
08/11 14:15, 9F
文章代碼(AID): #1I1eSibI (Eng-Class)
文章代碼(AID): #1I1eSibI (Eng-Class)