[文法]假設語氣與過去事實相反,if子句不能用be-V已刪文
看板Eng-Class (英文板)作者LechiWaky (like a black widow)時間11年前 (2014/10/15 16:57)推噓3(3推 0噓 12→)留言15則, 5人參與討論串1/1
假設語氣與過去事實相反,if子句內不能用be動詞嗎??
我看了文法書(Live ABC圖表解構英文文法)
與現在事實相反的部分,它寫了:
If + S + 過去簡單式 + V could
(then) S + might + V
If + S + were... should
would
與現在事實相反的If子句部分他有特別寫出were
但在與過去事實相反的部分,它卻只有寫:
could
If + S + had + p.p. (then) S + might + have + p.p
should
would
難道是與過去事實相反的if子句不能用be動詞嗎??
像 If he had been on the bus, he might have been die. 是錯的
要用
If he had gotten on the bus, he might have been die. 這樣?
還是它漏寫了?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.161.171.15
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1413363442.A.5F9.html
推
10/15 17:05, , 1F
10/15 17:05, 1F
→
10/15 17:05, , 2F
10/15 17:05, 2F
→
10/15 17:07, , 3F
10/15 17:07, 3F
→
10/15 17:07, , 4F
10/15 17:07, 4F
推
10/16 15:51, , 5F
10/16 15:51, 5F
→
10/16 15:54, , 6F
10/16 15:54, 6F
→
10/16 15:55, , 7F
10/16 15:55, 7F
→
10/16 15:56, , 8F
10/16 15:56, 8F
→
10/16 16:55, , 9F
10/16 16:55, 9F
→
10/16 16:56, , 10F
10/16 16:56, 10F
推
10/17 00:55, , 11F
10/17 00:55, 11F
→
10/29 14:20, , 12F
10/29 14:20, 12F
→
10/29 14:20, , 13F
10/29 14:20, 13F
→
10/29 14:20, , 14F
10/29 14:20, 14F
→
10/29 14:20, , 15F
10/29 14:20, 15F
Eng-Class 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
