[文法] 對等連接詞 and 主詞相同省略?
我知道對等連接詞 前後是接相同詞性 e.g adj and adj /子句 and 子句 /n and n
今天看到有人句子寫 he was angry and didn't laugh。
學伴認為應該要寫 he was angry and he didn't laugh. 因為兩者詞性不一樣
一個是be動詞 (狀態) 一個則是didn't 助動詞 (表示動作)
但我倒覺得沒甚麼不對 因為講的都是同個人 只是省略主詞罷了
回家翻文法書後發現還真的沒有and例句是 前面 be.v and aux.
因此上來問問版大們
請問and 前後可以 擺不同性質的動詞嗎? 如例句
還是說如果動詞性質不一樣 就必須 +主詞 變成 句子 and 句子 (如例句2)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.121.201.44
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1423152274.A.41E.html
→
02/06 00:30, , 1F
02/06 00:30, 1F
→
02/06 00:30, , 2F
02/06 00:30, 2F
→
02/06 00:30, , 3F
02/06 00:30, 3F
→
02/06 00:31, , 4F
02/06 00:31, 4F
→
02/06 00:31, , 5F
02/06 00:31, 5F
→
, , 6F
02/06 00:31
sorry 上面兩句不大懂..
→
02/06 00:32, , 7F
02/06 00:32, 7F
→
02/06 00:32, , 8F
02/06 00:32, 8F
謝謝d大 所以如predicate那篇 最後一句寫著 "the predicate usually follows the
subject and tell us sth about it " 證實我的問題答案 應該是
he was angry and he didn't laugh 。對吧? @@ 因為你第二給的文獻資料我開不起來
所以我只看第一份
※ 編輯: benyan1993 (122.121.201.44), 02/06/2015 00:55:36
→
02/06 10:19, , 9F
02/06 10:19, 9F
所以s大認為he was angry and didn't laugh 是可的嗎？ 我也記得說主詞相同可，可是
看完剛d大貼的資料，又有點不確定了@@
※ 編輯: benyan1993 (122.121.204.241), 02/06/2015 10:31:33
※ 編輯: benyan1993 (122.121.204.241), 02/06/2015 10:49:10
※ 編輯: benyan1993 (122.121.204.241), 02/06/2015 10:50:29
推
02/06 13:54, , 10F
02/06 13:54, 10F
→
02/06 13:54, , 11F
02/06 13:54, 11F
→
02/06 14:10, , 12F
02/06 14:10, 12F
推
02/06 14:24, , 13F
02/06 14:24, 13F
→
02/06 14:25, , 14F
02/06 14:25, 14F
→
02/07 01:03, , 15F
02/07 01:03, 15F
→
02/07 01:03, , 16F
02/07 01:03, 16F
→
02/07 01:04, , 17F
02/07 01:04, 17F
→
02/07 01:06, , 18F
02/07 01:06, 18F
→
02/07 01:06, , 19F
02/07 01:06, 19F
推
02/08 14:34, , 20F
02/08 14:34, 20F
→
02/08 14:34, , 21F
02/08 14:34, 21F
→
02/08 14:35, , 22F
02/08 14:35, 22F
推
02/09 17:54, , 23F
02/09 17:54, 23F
→
02/09 17:54, , 24F
02/09 17:54, 24F
→
02/09 17:54, , 25F
02/09 17:54, 25F
→
02/09 17:54, , 26F
02/09 17:54, 26F
→
02/09 17:54, , 27F
02/09 17:54, 27F
→
02/09 17:54, , 28F
02/09 17:54, 28F
Eng-Class 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章