[課業] 於法殊有未合
想請問一個可能很白痴的問題
看到判例裡"於法殊有未合"
意思是在法律上,有不合之處?!
還是在法律上並無不合之處???
不好意思喔...這種問題可能很令人不屑
所以我得到答案之後會自刪.....
先感謝了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 120.118.244.112
→
04/20 16:26, , 1F
04/20 16:26, 1F
→
04/20 16:36, , 2F
04/20 16:36, 2F
→
04/20 16:38, , 3F
04/20 16:38, 3F
推
04/20 16:38, , 4F
04/20 16:38, 4F
推
04/20 16:55, , 5F
04/20 16:55, 5F
→
04/20 17:02, , 6F
04/20 17:02, 6F
→
04/20 17:03, , 7F
04/20 17:03, 7F
推
04/20 17:24, , 8F
04/20 17:24, 8F
推
04/20 17:25, , 9F
04/20 17:25, 9F
推
04/20 17:44, , 10F
04/20 17:44, 10F
推
04/20 17:59, , 11F
04/20 17:59, 11F
→
04/20 18:00, , 12F
04/20 18:00, 12F
推
04/20 18:37, , 13F
04/20 18:37, 13F
→
04/20 18:41, , 14F
04/20 18:41, 14F
推
04/21 08:38, , 15F
04/21 08:38, 15F
→
04/21 12:24, , 16F
04/21 12:24, 16F
→
10/11 22:21, , 17F
10/11 22:21, 17F
Examination 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章