Re: [考試] 請問一題argument

看板GRE (GRE入學考試)作者Pluronics (= =)時間17年前 (2007/08/15 07:17)推噓1(1推 0噓 0→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串2/4 (看更多)

※ 引述《neopunk (Angelic whisper)》之銘言： : The following is a letter to the editor of a local newspaper. : "As a local merchant, I wish to support the development of a ski resort : in the state park north of our township. Along with many other merchants : who favor the proposal by Ski the Slopes, Incorporated, I would, of : course, experience a growth in my business. But I also know how much more : prosperous, not to mention lively and interesting, our community would be : if tourism increased. Since the main opposition comes from a few : environmentalists* who do not even live in this community, I see no reason : to give in to their views. The First National Bank has finally researched : the project and agreed to fund it. As a result, I see no reason to delay : development of the resort." : *Environmentalists are people who advocate the preservation of the natural : environment. 1.滑雪場不一定能夠振興本地旅遊業,考量因素太多,作者需要證明 2.環保團體儘管人數少,不住本地,但也不表示他們的反對無代表性作者需要客觀論述,而非主觀論定不具代表說不定不建滑雪場,經營生態旅遊(ecotourism)還比較好滑雪場不一定是最好的選擇 3.銀行同意贊助只能代表此投資銀行自己有可圖利的地方, 不代表對社區環境或利益無害對於這個計劃,銀行所考量的因素作者要講清楚,而不是一語帶過, : 這一題想不太出來該怎麼反駁比較有力道 : 尤其是黃字部分的句子，實在不太了解他想表達的意思 : 那個轉折用的but讓我覺得好怪呀... : 可以請好心的版友給些解釋和答題方向嗎~~ : 非常感謝 :) 就是指讓我投資滑雪場不只我有得賺, 社區也有的賺得意思 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.166.207.45