[問題] 新GRE閱讀邏輯10套的問題

看板GRE (GRE入學考試)作者 (Keep Going)時間13年前 (2012/05/18 11:36), 編輯推噓0(003)
留言3則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/1
大家好,做這份練習的時候遇到疑問,希望有人可以解惑, 非常感謝! 練習四 7.In Bassaria a group of that country's most senior judges has criticized the uniform mandatory sentences recently introduced for certain specific crimes.The judges argue that such sentences, by depriving them of all discretion in setting sentences, make it impos- sible for them to consider either aggravating or exten- uating circumstances and so make it impossible to achieve true justice─the fitting of the severity of the punishment to the gravity of the particular crime. Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest evidence for the claim that in Bassaria the newly introduced mandatory sentences are not necessarily a change for the worse with respect to achieving true justice as defined in the argument? (A)Before mandatory sentencing, judges in eastern Bassaria imposed strikingly different sentences from those in western Bassaria for equally grave instances of the same kind of offense. (B)In Bassaria the frequency of crimes that have been made subject to mandatory sentences is lower now than it was just prior to the intro- duction of mandatory sentencing. (C)The law introducing mandatory sentences was passed in the legislature of Bassaria by a large majority and is unlikely to be repealed in the foreseeable future. (D)There used to be a wide difference between the minimum and the maximum sentences allowed by law in cases of crimes now subject to man- datory sentences. (E)In Bassaria judges are appointed for life and are thus not easily influenced by political pressure groups. 這題答案是A,但我選的是D -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.116.253.121

05/19 17:02, , 1F
A比較好因為是改革前判刑差異太大是事實,D只是允許
05/19 17:02, 1F

05/19 17:04, , 2F
這可能性,但也許法官們的判決很一致。不需強制改革
05/19 17:04, 2F

05/21 15:52, , 3F
謝謝您的說明!
05/21 15:52, 3F
文章代碼(AID): #1FjSFJGC (GRE)
文章代碼(AID): #1FjSFJGC (GRE)