[情報] USPTO新法暫停實施

看板Patent (專利)作者 (莫忘初衷)時間18年前 (2007/11/01 10:51), 編輯推噓7(7014)
留言21則, 8人參與, 最新討論串1/4 (看更多)
NOTICE REGARDING CLAIMS AND CONTINUATIONS RULES The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a final rule notice in the Federal Register to revise the rules of practice in patent cases relating to continuing applications and requests for continued examination practices, and for the examination of claims in patent applications. See Changes to Practice for Continued Examination Filings, Patent Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims, and Examination of Claims in Patent Applications, 72 Fed. Reg. 46716 (Aug. 21, 2007) (Claims and Continuations Final Rule). The final rule notice published in the Federal Register indicates that the effective date for the changes to the rules of practice in the Claims and Continuations Final Rule is November 1, 2007. On October 31, 2007, the United States District Court for the Eastern District Court of Virginia, however, issued a Preliminary Injunction enjoining the USPTO from implementing the changes in the Claims and Continuations Final Rule. Therefore, the changes to the rules of practice in the Claims and Continuations Final Rule will not go into effect on November 1, 2007. USPTO employees are to continue processing and examining patent applications under the rules and procedures in effect on October 31, 2007, until further notice. This Web site will be updated and USPTO employees will be notified with further information as it becomes available. Inquiries regarding this notice should be directed to the appropriate TC representative. http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/GSK_20PI_20Order.pdf -- 恩...不太清楚發preliminary injunction的原因 不知道有沒有人可以提供一下 總而言之是個好消息... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.120.41.52

11/01 11:19, , 1F
本日最紅消息
11/01 11:19, 1F
※ 編輯: barley 來自: 59.120.41.52 (11/01 11:51)

11/01 11:57, , 2F
也很好奇為什麼州法院的的禁制令可以約束USPTO
11/01 11:57, 2F

11/01 12:07, , 3F
interesting!
11/01 12:07, 3F

11/01 12:13, , 4F
州法院..嗎 可能uspto總部或主機剛好在那州 屬地給他判?
11/01 12:13, 4F

11/01 12:16, , 5F
這間是Federal Ct.理由是PTO逾越權限(有點類似台灣行政
11/01 12:16, 5F

11/01 12:20, , 6F
法的法律保留原則) 對firm這可能是好消息 但對常被美韓
11/01 12:20, 6F

11/01 12:21, , 7F
大廠以CA等子孫案控告侵權的台灣inhouse卻可能是壞消息
11/01 12:21, 7F

11/01 15:48, , 8F
聽同事說USPTO總部也在Virginia 所以他可以發injunction
11/01 15:48, 8F

11/01 15:49, , 9F
不過如果federal court覺得不合理的話 也許還會翻案
11/01 15:49, 9F

11/01 16:22, , 10F
這間是聯邦地院,而且是有名的Rocket Docket,審一個訴訟
11/01 16:22, 10F

11/01 16:26, , 11F
比USPTO審一件申請案還快
11/01 16:26, 11F

11/02 22:43, , 12F
這不是聯邦法院...這個Injunction最上面很明顯寫著
11/02 22:43, 12F

11/02 22:43, , 13F
THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA....
11/02 22:43, 13F

11/02 22:44, , 14F
這是地院....這件案子雙方都很堅持而且後台都很硬..
11/02 22:44, 14F

11/02 22:44, , 15F
最後打到SUPREME COURT的機會很大....
11/02 22:44, 15F

11/02 22:45, , 16F
更正..是最上面寫著DISTRICT COURT..所以可知是地院..
11/02 22:45, 16F

11/03 01:23, , 17F
DISTRICT COURT可以是州體系的地院,也可以是聯邦法院體系
11/03 01:23, 17F

11/03 01:24, , 18F
的下級法院/地院,但是只有聯邦體系地院才會稱呼為
11/03 01:24, 18F

11/03 01:25, , 19F
the "United States" District Court for .....
11/03 01:25, 19F

11/03 01:25, , 20F
THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA是眾多聯邦地院中審理
11/03 01:25, 20F

11/03 01:26, , 21F
專利速最快的,所以被稱為Rocket Docket
11/03 01:26, 21F
文章代碼(AID): #17AJykcM (Patent)
文章代碼(AID): #17AJykcM (Patent)