[問題] minor revision
最近收到期刊回來的comment
總共有三個reviewer的意見
前兩個都算正面
唯有第三個reviewer比較多問題
而從他的問題感覺出來是看不太懂文章的內容
In the abstract, it is mentionsed that “In this work, a xxx is proposed to
xxx ....” Does this method refers to [14]?
It is not clear whether Algorithm 3 is proposed in [14] or by this work."
因為前兩個reviewer也都有說文章是well-written
所以很尷尬不知道要不要針對這個comment去修改文章架構
還是說在response裡面用別的方式解釋給reviewer聽就可以
而editor最後是給"minor revision for resubmit"
以上想說向各位請教一些建議
謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.113.228.174
→
11/17 18:34, , 1F
11/17 18:34, 1F
→
11/17 19:01, , 2F
11/17 19:01, 2F
→
11/17 19:32, , 3F
11/17 19:32, 3F
推
11/17 20:12, , 4F
11/17 20:12, 4F
→
11/17 20:14, , 5F
11/17 20:14, 5F
→
11/17 20:15, , 6F
11/17 20:15, 6F
推
11/17 22:15, , 7F
11/17 22:15, 7F
→
11/17 22:15, , 8F
11/17 22:15, 8F
→
11/18 07:19, , 9F
11/18 07:19, 9F
推
11/18 08:22, , 10F
11/18 08:22, 10F
→
11/18 08:23, , 11F
11/18 08:23, 11F
→
11/18 08:23, , 12F
11/18 08:23, 12F
推
11/20 15:16, , 13F
11/20 15:16, 13F
→
11/20 15:17, , 14F
11/20 15:17, 14F
→
11/20 15:17, , 15F
11/20 15:17, 15F
→
11/20 15:18, , 16F
11/20 15:18, 16F
→
11/20 15:18, , 17F
11/20 15:18, 17F
→
11/20 15:19, , 18F
11/20 15:19, 18F
→
11/20 15:19, , 19F
11/20 15:19, 19F
→
11/20 15:31, , 20F
11/20 15:31, 20F
→
12/14 21:18, , 21F
12/14 21:18, 21F
PhD 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章