Re: [問題] 請問這樣還可以投原期刊嗎?

看板PhD (博士班)作者wencc (賣菜刀的)時間11年前 (2014/08/11 02:31)推噓3(3推 0噓 14→)

留言17則, 6人參與討論串4/4 (看更多)

原文恕刪~ 想借標題問一下我自己的情形今年三月我丟了第一篇paper出去五月底的時候收到第一次的feedback 兩個reviewer的意見都還算正面，問了一些問題我也都能完整的回答所以修改之後就再送出去了然後今天收到第二次的feedback 前面這兩個reviewer都說OK，而且recommend to publish 但是.....多了第三個reviewer，他是這樣寫的 The efficiency of this type of XXXX was slightly improved compared to conventional XXXX but its application to industrial or power plant installations seems to be limited (see the following comments). Although the paper falls within the scope of the journal , is timely and original, and the results are of practical importance for application to XXXX, I do not recommend the manuscript for publication in the Journal of XXXX due to the following reasons: *我自己看起來，這些理由跟其他兩位reviewer在第一次feedback寫的理由"動機"滿像的 *都是希望我改或增加一些東西。只是不知道為什麼他馬上就說not recommend *而且我的東西本來就是要主打non-industrial applications，不知道為什麼他一直打 *我的東西在industry不是很有用主編的email在一開頭的內文就寫 Dear Mr., I regret to inform you that the reviewers of your manuscript have advised against publication of your paper at this time. For your guidance, the reviewers' comments are included below. If you feel that you can provide a greatly revised paper that incorporates all of the reviewers' suggestions and addresses all concerns, I invite you to resubmit your work. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Sincerely yours, Associate Editor 應該是很清楚的拒絕我了不知道這樣還需要花時間在這個journal上嗎? 還是趕緊投別的? 像這種情形，如果要改投別的期刊，那manuscript需要改過再投嗎? 還是原封不動的丟出去就好? 第一篇paper就被拒絕，沒甚麼經驗，請大家指教謝謝 ps 主編自己在這個領域也是有做過一些東西(理論派)，我有reference過他一些文章不過我這篇全部都是在講實驗，就是一個新的機構 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 76.104.182.108 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PhD/M.1407695464.A.642.html