[問題] 不扣薪,但可不給薪??
覺得有時候法規很繞,到底什麼意思
例如颱風假
雇主不可扣薪,但可不給薪
假設我一個月薪水三萬,這個月有一天颱風假
雇主不可扣薪,也就是我要領三萬才是對的
但可不給薪,也就是雇主可以不支付颱風當天一日薪
等於有颱風假的話,當月我領不到三萬,那實質上還不是扣薪的意思了
所以,不可扣薪但可不給薪,這句話到底是什麼意義
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.74.24.125 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Salary/M.1726101007.A.536.html
→
09/12 08:32,
4周前
, 1F
09/12 08:32, 1F
推
09/12 08:57,
4周前
, 2F
09/12 08:57, 2F
→
09/12 08:57,
4周前
, 3F
09/12 08:57, 3F
→
09/12 08:58,
4周前
, 4F
09/12 08:58, 4F
推
09/12 09:05,
4周前
, 5F
09/12 09:05, 5F
→
09/12 09:06,
4周前
, 6F
09/12 09:06, 6F
→
09/12 09:07,
4周前
, 7F
09/12 09:07, 7F
噓
09/12 09:21,
4周前
, 8F
09/12 09:21, 8F
→
09/12 09:22,
4周前
, 9F
09/12 09:22, 9F
→
09/12 09:22,
4周前
, 10F
09/12 09:22, 10F
噓
09/12 09:33,
4周前
, 11F
09/12 09:33, 11F
→
09/12 09:33,
4周前
, 12F
09/12 09:33, 12F
噓
09/12 09:41,
4周前
, 13F
09/12 09:41, 13F
→
09/12 09:41,
4周前
, 14F
09/12 09:41, 14F
→
09/12 09:51,
4周前
, 15F
09/12 09:51, 15F
→
09/12 09:52,
4周前
, 16F
09/12 09:52, 16F
→
09/12 09:58,
4周前
, 17F
09/12 09:58, 17F
→
09/12 09:58,
4周前
, 18F
09/12 09:58, 18F
推
09/12 11:26,
4周前
, 19F
09/12 11:26, 19F
噓
09/12 11:45,
4周前
, 20F
09/12 11:45, 20F
噓
09/12 12:33,
4周前
, 21F
09/12 12:33, 21F
推
09/12 12:58,
4周前
, 22F
09/12 12:58, 22F
推
09/12 17:36,
4周前
, 23F
09/12 17:36, 23F
推
09/12 19:29,
4周前
, 24F
09/12 19:29, 24F
→
09/12 19:29,
4周前
, 25F
09/12 19:29, 25F
→
09/12 19:29,
4周前
, 26F
09/12 19:29, 26F
推
09/12 19:30,
4周前
, 27F
09/12 19:30, 27F
噓
09/12 21:17,
4周前
, 28F
09/12 21:17, 28F
→
09/12 21:17,
4周前
, 29F
09/12 21:17, 29F
推
09/13 17:08,
3周前
, 30F
09/13 17:08, 30F
→
09/14 14:21,
3周前
, 31F
09/14 14:21, 31F
推
09/16 15:34,
3周前
, 32F
09/16 15:34, 32F
推
09/17 04:33,
3周前
, 33F
09/17 04:33, 33F
Salary 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
752
1491