[情報] 我川開放聆聽報價及關稅公式可能的來源
在華爾街沒事的大跌後
白宮發布了我川輕鬆愉快的照片
要大家相信川普總統的運籌帷幄
川普的首席貿易顧問在CNBC堅稱新關稅政策不是
美國作為與其他國家談判更佳貿易條款的工具。
Top Trump trade advisor Peter Navarro denied that Trump's new tariffs are being
used as a tool to negotiate better trade terms with other countries.
"This is not a negotiation," Navarro said on CNBC's "Closing Bell: Overtime."
"This is not that. This is a national emergency," he said.
— Kevin Breuninger
我川沒有按照白宮助理的堅持態度
在空軍一號上改口開放談判態度
After multiple White House aides insisted that the new tariffs were not a negoti
ation, Trump said he would be open to negotiating with other countries about the
duties.
Trump said he would be open to tariff talks with other counties if they offer so
mething phenomenal, Reuters reported him saying on Air Force One.
Top trade aide Peter Navarro told CNBC less than an hour earlier that the sweepi
ng tariffs are "not a negotiation."
— Kevin Breuninger
https://reurl.cc/AMOXgp
*其他報導指出川普在宣布關稅後外出打高爾夫球,並且對股市暴跌並不感到擔憂。
*在川普搭機前往佛州的路上,其他報載也提到川普做出開放聆聽其他國家報價的評論
https://i.imgur.com/LfEW2bN.jpeg


另外,根據The Verge
川普讓經濟學者疑惑的新關稅公式有「可能」來自於人工智能的聊天機器人
Trump’s new tariff math looks a lot like ChatGPT’sChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, and C
laude all recommend the same “nonsense” tariff calculation.
其中一段
Where did these numbers come from? Apparently, an oversimplified calculation tha
t several major AI chatbots happen to recommend.
Economist James Surowiecki quickly reverse-engineered a possible explanation for
the tariff pricing. He found you could recreate each of the White House’s numb
ers by simply taking a given country’s trade deficit with the US and dividing i
t by their total exports to the US. Halve that number, and you get a ready-to-us
e “discounted reciprocal tariff.” The White House objected to this claim and p
ublished the formula it says that it used, but as Politico points out, the formu
la looks like a dressed-up version of Surowiecki’s method.
In case you weren’t sure, Surowiecki calls this approach “extraordinary nonsen
se.” So why did Trump’s team use it? Well, like plenty of people who’ve reali
zed their homework is due in three hours’ time, it seems like they may have bee
n tempted by AI.
https://i.imgur.com/2YsUwq3.png




A number of X users have realized that if you ask ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, or Gr
ok for an “easy” way to solve trade deficits and put the US on “an even playi
ng field”, they’ll give you a version of this “deficit divided by exports” f
ormula with remarkable consistency. The Verge tested this with the phrasing used
in those posts, as well as a question based more closely on the government’s l
anguage, asking chatbots for “an easy way for the US to calculate tariffs that
should be imposed on other countries to balance bilateral trade deficits between
the US and each of its trading partners, with the goal of driving bilateral tra
de deficits to zero.” All four platforms gave us the same fundamental suggestio
n.
如果向ChatGPT、Gemini、Claude 或 Grok 詢問解決美國貿易逆差的“簡單”方法,使美國
處於“公平的競爭環境”,會得到一致「逆差除以出口」的公式。
The bots caution with varying levels of seriousness that there are tradeoffs and
complications. Gemini, the most strident of them, will give you a page full of
explanations as to why this oversimplified approach could backfire — “while th
is calculation offers a seemingly straightforward way to target bilateral trade
deficits, the real-world economic implications are far more complex and could le
ad to substantial negative consequences,” it warns, adding that “many economis
ts argue that tariffs are not an effective tool for balancing trade deficits.”
但是這些機器人也有解釋若以這樣簡單的結論來解決雙邊貿易逆差,會得到適得其反的結果
來源:
https://reurl.cc/LaMe0x
根據金融時報
我川可能很快會對晶片及藥品下手
https://reurl.cc/XAVxlD
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 218.35.160.207 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1743725181.A.F23.html
推
04/04 08:07,
19小時前
, 1F
04/04 08:07, 1F
推
04/04 08:07,
19小時前
, 2F
04/04 08:07, 2F
推
04/04 08:08,
19小時前
, 3F
04/04 08:08, 3F
推
04/04 08:08,
19小時前
, 4F
04/04 08:08, 4F
推
04/04 08:12,
19小時前
, 5F
04/04 08:12, 5F
推
04/04 08:13,
19小時前
, 6F
04/04 08:13, 6F
推
04/04 08:13,
19小時前
, 7F
04/04 08:13, 7F
噓
04/04 08:14,
19小時前
, 8F
04/04 08:14, 8F
推
04/04 08:14,
19小時前
, 9F
04/04 08:14, 9F
推
04/04 08:18,
19小時前
, 10F
04/04 08:18, 10F
推
04/04 08:18,
19小時前
, 11F
04/04 08:18, 11F
→
04/04 08:19,
19小時前
, 12F
04/04 08:19, 12F

推
04/04 08:24,
19小時前
, 13F
04/04 08:24, 13F
推
04/04 08:25,
19小時前
, 14F
04/04 08:25, 14F
噓
04/04 08:29,
19小時前
, 15F
04/04 08:29, 15F
推
04/04 08:30,
19小時前
, 16F
04/04 08:30, 16F
推
04/04 08:30,
19小時前
, 17F
04/04 08:30, 17F
推
04/04 08:32,
19小時前
, 18F
04/04 08:32, 18F
噓
04/04 08:34,
18小時前
, 19F
04/04 08:34, 19F
→
04/04 08:34,
18小時前
, 20F
04/04 08:34, 20F
推
04/04 08:35,
18小時前
, 21F
04/04 08:35, 21F
→
04/04 08:35,
18小時前
, 22F
04/04 08:35, 22F
推
04/04 08:38,
18小時前
, 23F
04/04 08:38, 23F
推
04/04 08:39,
18小時前
, 24F
04/04 08:39, 24F
噓
04/04 08:39,
18小時前
, 25F
04/04 08:39, 25F
推
04/04 08:40,
18小時前
, 26F
04/04 08:40, 26F
→
04/04 08:40,
18小時前
, 27F
04/04 08:40, 27F
推
04/04 08:43,
18小時前
, 28F
04/04 08:43, 28F
→
04/04 08:47,
18小時前
, 29F
04/04 08:47, 29F

推
04/04 08:56,
18小時前
, 30F
04/04 08:56, 30F
噓
04/04 09:00,
18小時前
, 31F
04/04 09:00, 31F
推
04/04 09:01,
18小時前
, 32F
04/04 09:01, 32F
推
04/04 09:02,
18小時前
, 33F
04/04 09:02, 33F
推
04/04 09:02,
18小時前
, 34F
04/04 09:02, 34F
推
04/04 09:04,
18小時前
, 35F
04/04 09:04, 35F
推
04/04 09:10,
18小時前
, 36F
04/04 09:10, 36F
推
04/04 09:29,
18小時前
, 37F
04/04 09:29, 37F
→
04/04 09:42,
17小時前
, 38F
04/04 09:42, 38F
噓
04/04 09:56,
17小時前
, 39F
04/04 09:56, 39F
Stock 近期熱門文章
202
345
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章