[請益] 請問這樣子寫整合寫作會高分嗎? 格式符合嗎?

看板TOEFL_iBT (TOEFL_iBT托福)作者eastsion (東方翔)時間16年前 (2009/12/02 21:06)推噓1(1推 0噓 2→)

留言3則, 1人參與討論串1/1

如題我這樣寫會高分嗎? 格式有沒有需要修改的地方? 謝謝各位指教 In the reading part, the writer states that there are sufficient evidence to prove Macro Polo never visited to China and Mongo. By contrast, the lecturer in the listening part dosen't think it convincing enough to deny the visit of Macro Polo in light of many other reasons. The writer illustrates the proof that Macro Polo never visited China and Mongo because of the lack of the place-name in his own book or the historic records. But the lecturer thinks it is anything but odd that Macro borrowed a name from Persian, which was ever a prevailing language among the traders, she still doesn't ignore the truth that Macro never got the place-name. What comes next is the lack of reference to the contemporarily popular tea in China, that is the powerful stance from the writer to cement his point. However, the lecturer doesn't think so, and she comes up with her own perspectives about the prosperity of tea in southern China instead of the northern part where Macro stayed so as to fully explicate the acceptance of omitting the tea part in his book. Moreover, the writer addresses that there is no pre-modern documents proving he ever served for Mongo for 17 years. But the lecturer thinks perhaps it was his name's unrecognibility causing the obstacle to modern historians' understanding. Briefly speaking, the writer holds that there is no satisfying evidence from the original records to demonstrate his visit. The lecturer oppositely thinks that different names he used, the fake name adopted by the adminstration, the chance of being lost all might be the reasons to elaborate his "possibile" visit. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 163.13.144.72