[請益] then當副詞有錯嗎?(麻辣講義國一下240頁)

看板Teacher (教師)作者 (wang fan)時間13年前 (2013/06/12 22:52), 編輯推噓6(6015)
留言21則, 6人參與, 最新討論串1/1
A:Is there a river near your house? B:No, there isn't, but there was one ______. (A)ago (B)before (C)now (D)then 答案是B 我查了遠東的字典 例句:It's three o'clock then. then是可以當時間副詞沒有錯啊! 請問老師們, 這一題為何不能選D呢? 謝謝! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 122.121.6.3

06/12 23:11, , 1F
我覺得語意不符
06/12 23:11, 1F

06/13 00:10, , 2F
then可以當副詞,但是有"at that time"的意思
06/13 00:10, 2F

06/13 00:11, , 3F
如果A說的是"我記得這裡以前(或某年)有條河"之類的
06/13 00:11, 3F

06/13 00:12, , 4F
B說 Yes, there was one then, but now there isn't.
06/13 00:12, 4F

06/13 00:13, , 5F
感覺就比較妥當了.文法不是詞性對就可以套用,語意更
06/13 00:13, 5F

06/13 00:13, , 6F
重要
06/13 00:13, 6F

06/13 00:14, , 7F
是說除了教甄的書以外,你也很需要加強英文咧......
06/13 00:14, 7F

06/13 00:30, , 8F
原PO可能陷入文法怪圈,多閱讀一些跳脫考試的書吧
06/13 00:30, 8F

06/13 00:30, , 9F
我想信原PO文法沒問題的 :)
06/13 00:30, 9F

06/13 11:29, , 10F
推K大,原PO也是英文老師,但看來對英文"理解"不足,不
06/13 11:29, 10F

06/13 11:29, , 11F
能只死背文法,要多了解文章或句子前後文意思才行~
06/13 11:29, 11F

06/13 15:33, , 12F
建議原po養成閱讀的習慣 學校很容易拿到各類英文雜誌
06/13 15:33, 12F

06/13 15:34, , 13F
難一點的像CNN或Advanced應該都不難要到 多看文章
06/13 15:34, 13F

06/13 15:34, , 14F
會讓語感好一點 不然只看考卷 參考書這些真的會降低
06/13 15:34, 14F

06/13 15:34, , 15F
自己的英文程度 共勉之!
06/13 15:34, 15F

06/13 16:53, , 16F
看自己有興趣的也可以,像我都在看超級英雄的wiki
06/13 16:53, 16F

06/13 21:31, , 17F
查英英字典會更準確!
06/13 21:31, 17F

06/13 21:32, , 18F
你會發現before和then 用法上的不同...
06/13 21:32, 18F

06/14 09:52, , 19F
雖然詞性都一樣(on和in也都是介系詞,難道用法都一
06/14 09:52, 19F

06/16 22:18, , 20F
推kee,then感覺是有個reference point,前文已經有建
06/16 22:18, 20F

06/16 22:18, , 21F
立過去某個時間點,再指稱該時間點;before則是general
06/16 22:18, 21F
文章代碼(AID): #1Hk8ilYd (Teacher)
文章代碼(AID): #1Hk8ilYd (Teacher)