[思辯] 剃刀法則是還原論嗎?

看板ask-why (知識奧秘)作者 (楚留香雞排)時間4年前 (2020/11/13 20:56), 編輯推噓1(100)
留言1則, 1人參與, 4年前最新討論串1/1
如題 Ocham's razor or law of parsimony is the problem -solving principle that "entities should not be multiplied without necessity" or, more simply, the simplest explanation is usually the right one. Reductionism is any of several related philosophical ideas regarding the associations between phenomena which can be described in terms of other simpler or more fundamental phenomena. It is also described as an intellectual and philosophical position that interprets a complex system as the sum of its parts 如果口袋裡的錢不見了 1.被外星人偷走 2.根本沒有放口袋 因為2.的複雜度較低 通常會比較正確 還原論是把系統的因素一層層剝開 撥開到最極致最簡單來理解運作 兩者都在追尋 單一 純粹 簡單 所以剃刀理論可以說是還原論的推廣? 把複雜度高的內容一層層丟掉多餘的變因 就是簡單的選項 這可以這樣歸類嗎@@ -- Sent from JPTT on my iPhone -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.220.255.143 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/ask-why/M.1605272165.A.F3F.html

11/14 17:03, 4年前 , 1F
複雜度低的情況下,它還需要是正確能解釋的
11/14 17:03, 1F
文章代碼(AID): #1Vhe9by_ (ask-why)
文章代碼(AID): #1Vhe9by_ (ask-why)