[公告] 版務詢問:體驗類文章是否合理?
正如同上一篇,最近越來越多這種文章
我想請教各位這類文章是否合理?
像之前有篇餐廳徵求部落客的,只供餐,要用文章作為交換.
我後來有跟PO文的人詢問,他說業內都這樣做.
我不懂這個,但板規明確定義要預算,所以我把它刪文了.
但想請教,這類是合理的嗎?
因為我認為高人氣的部落客,廠商還得花錢請他寫稿並曝光
沒道理沒人氣的部落客就一毛錢都拿不到吧?
廠商總是號稱商品高價,藉此壓低部落客的價碼
感覺很不合理,但我不懂.
所以請各位提供點行內意見,謝謝!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 124.11.64.96
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/soho/M.1436165293.A.57B.html
→
07/06 15:41, , 1F
07/06 15:41, 1F
→
07/06 15:41, , 2F
07/06 15:41, 2F
→
07/06 15:41, , 3F
07/06 15:41, 3F
→
07/06 16:50, , 4F
07/06 16:50, 4F
→
07/06 17:04, , 5F
07/06 17:04, 5F
推
07/06 17:09, , 6F
07/06 17:09, 6F
→
07/06 17:16, , 7F
07/06 17:16, 7F
→
07/06 17:17, , 8F
07/06 17:17, 8F
→
07/06 17:17, , 9F
07/06 17:17, 9F
→
07/06 17:18, , 10F
07/06 17:18, 10F
→
07/06 17:19, , 11F
07/06 17:19, 11F
→
07/06 17:19, , 12F
07/06 17:19, 12F
→
07/06 17:20, , 13F
07/06 17:20, 13F
→
07/06 17:24, , 14F
07/06 17:24, 14F
→
07/06 18:25, , 15F
07/06 18:25, 15F
→
07/06 18:26, , 16F
07/06 18:26, 16F
→
07/06 18:27, , 17F
07/06 18:27, 17F
→
07/06 18:29, , 18F
07/06 18:29, 18F
→
07/06 18:30, , 19F
07/06 18:30, 19F
→
07/06 18:30, , 20F
07/06 18:30, 20F
→
07/06 18:31, , 21F
07/06 18:31, 21F
→
07/06 18:32, , 22F
07/06 18:32, 22F
→
07/06 18:32, , 23F
07/06 18:32, 23F
→
07/06 18:33, , 24F
07/06 18:33, 24F
→
07/06 18:34, , 25F
07/06 18:34, 25F
推
07/06 22:00, , 26F
07/06 22:00, 26F
推
07/06 22:15, , 27F
07/06 22:15, 27F
→
07/06 22:15, , 28F
07/06 22:15, 28F
→
07/06 22:16, , 29F
07/06 22:16, 29F
→
07/06 22:16, , 30F
07/06 22:16, 30F
→
07/06 22:16, , 31F
07/06 22:16, 31F
→
07/06 22:17, , 32F
07/06 22:17, 32F
→
07/06 22:18, , 33F
07/06 22:18, 33F
→
07/06 22:19, , 34F
07/06 22:19, 34F
了解.以餐點來說拍照可能還得簡單後製,所以業主說供餐就是酬勞的部份讓我挺不以為然~
價碼原來如此 這樣大概知道了~
推
07/07 01:37, , 35F
07/07 01:37, 35F
→
07/07 01:38, , 36F
07/07 01:38, 36F
→
07/07 01:38, , 37F
07/07 01:38, 37F
→
07/07 01:38, , 38F
07/07 01:38, 38F
的確是兩碼子事,當事人同意歸同意,不能以此要求其他人也用一樣的標準看待.
→
07/07 17:51, , 39F
07/07 17:51, 39F
PT有個比較令人納悶的規定,就是非時薪工作禁止張貼
之前請一個錯版的版友轉文過去後,說被禁止貼非時薪的兼職工作...
可又不是所有兼職都算時薪XD
推
07/07 18:28, , 40F
07/07 18:28, 40F
→
07/07 18:28, , 41F
07/07 18:28, 41F
→
07/07 18:28, , 42F
07/07 18:28, 42F
→
07/07 18:28, , 43F
07/07 18:28, 43F
推
07/07 21:11, , 44F
07/07 21:11, 44F
我一直很擔心這點,但無餘力處理這類情形.
目前板規有針對過低薪資做處置(例如幫貼文一次1元),但高規低價這類就很難規範並審核
(如10萬的網站只出5000)
※ 編輯: felaray (124.11.64.96), 07/07/2015 22:11:07
推
07/07 22:49, , 45F
07/07 22:49, 45F
→
07/07 22:49, , 46F
07/07 22:49, 46F
→
07/07 22:57, , 47F
07/07 22:57, 47F
→
07/07 23:15, , 48F
07/07 23:15, 48F
→
07/07 23:17, , 49F
07/07 23:17, 49F
→
07/07 23:18, , 50F
07/07 23:18, 50F
→
07/07 23:18, , 51F
07/07 23:18, 51F
→
07/07 23:22, , 52F
07/07 23:22, 52F
推
07/08 02:12, , 53F
07/08 02:12, 53F
→
07/08 02:13, , 54F
07/08 02:13, 54F
→
07/08 02:13, , 55F
07/08 02:13, 55F
→
07/08 02:13, , 56F
07/08 02:13, 56F
推
07/13 01:20, , 57F
07/13 01:20, 57F
→
07/13 01:21, , 58F
07/13 01:21, 58F
→
07/13 01:22, , 59F
07/13 01:22, 59F
→
07/13 01:22, , 60F
07/13 01:22, 60F
→
07/13 01:23, , 61F
07/13 01:23, 61F
→
07/13 01:23, , 62F
07/13 01:23, 62F
soho 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章