[請益] 解構一句話的英文文法

看板teaching (教材板)作者 (眼角彎彎睫毛眨阿眨)時間8年前 (2016/03/12 15:43), 編輯推噓4(4010)
留言14則, 5人參與, 最新討論串1/1
大家好 桃高104年甄試題目裡面其中一題: he had , after all , divorced his first wife , broken relations with the Catholic Church and married Anne Boleyn for the sake of _____ was supposed to be a male heir. (a)that (b)which (c)it (d)what 以往遇到這種考關代的題目都會選錯 帶學生看學測考題也經常看到類似的題目 因為教關代時印象中有of which 就直接選which 但寫完再看一次覺得很怪 但又選不出來其他答案 正確答案是 what 單看for the sake of a male heir 意思是他再婚的原因是想要一個男繼承人 加上了was supposed to be就有點混亂了 想知道如何解構這個句子? 謝謝! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.115.228.18 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/teaching/M.1457768603.A.2E3.html

03/12 21:40, , 1F
這是在講英王亨利八世的第一任妻子生無男丁,再娶第二
03/12 21:40, 1F

03/12 21:41, , 2F
任妻子安妮,為了繼承其王位。
03/12 21:41, 2F

03/12 21:43, , 3F
of which 是指「哪裡」,what 指「某」王位繼承人。
03/12 21:43, 3F

03/12 21:46, , 4F
which 有明確指出那個「誰」的意思,由於還沒出世,故
03/12 21:46, 4F

03/12 21:48, , 5F
用 what 指不特定的「某個」(有可能的)繼承人那個人。
03/12 21:48, 5F

03/12 21:52, , 6F
「索引詞」(indexical term)與代名詞的區別。
03/12 21:52, 6F

03/13 02:01, , 7F
看不懂樓上的解釋..
03/13 02:01, 7F

03/13 02:01, , 8F
for the sake of 後面一定是接:名詞
03/13 02:01, 8F

03/13 14:44, , 9F
What=the thing which 代進去看就知道了
03/13 14:44, 9F

03/13 14:47, , 10F
另外看"__ was supposed to..."這句話缺主詞,所以一定
03/13 14:47, 10F

03/13 14:47, , 11F
選what=the thing(名詞)+ which(關係代名詞)
03/13 14:47, 11F

03/13 14:49, , 12F
完全用句子結構解就可以
03/13 14:49, 12F

03/17 13:54, , 13F
你知道要接名詞,就帶入名詞子句就是答案了
03/17 13:54, 13F

03/31 18:29, , 14F
因為這根本不是在考關代,而是間接問句
03/31 18:29, 14F
文章代碼(AID): #1MuyYRBZ (teaching)
文章代碼(AID): #1MuyYRBZ (teaching)