Fw: [文法] 詞典解釋中的「,that..」及「,are...」

看板teaching (教材板)作者 (scalper)時間8年前 (2016/09/28 03:40), 8年前編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 Eng-Class 看板 #1NwhZbzc ] Huddleston and Pullum (The Cambridge Grammar of Modern English, 2002.1025) say that who and which are normally (my emphasis) used in non-restrictive clause, but add that some speakers do accept that. I use who and which, but accept that.The original sentence, with that in a non-restrictive clause, did not strike me as strange. https://goo.gl/Qag0K9 -- ※ 編輯: perspicuity (111.241.146.213), 09/28/2016 03:08:51 ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ※ 轉錄者: perspicuity (111.241.146.213), 09/28/2016 03:40:33
文章代碼(AID): #1Nwiipxz (teaching)
文章代碼(AID): #1Nwiipxz (teaching)