[情報] DSP期刊的審查評分項目

看板AfterPhD (博士後)作者lacrosse (明曉枝頭花妙舞)時間9年前 (2017/03/13 01:30)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串1/1

Please respond to the following points: (Place an X on the line in front of your response.) 1. Quality of technical content ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 1a. novelty ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 1b. value ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 1c. rigor ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 1d. sufficiency of examples ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 1e. cogency ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 2. Clarity of presentation ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 2a. clarity of abstract ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 2b. abstract & paper consistency ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 2c. introduction of subject V Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3. Presentation V Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3a. organization & length V Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3b. expression of English ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3c. quality of diagrams/captions ___ Excellent ___ Good V Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3d. appropriate key words ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3e. editorial consistency (xrefs) ___ Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3f. bibliography format ___ Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 4. References to previous works ___ Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 5. Is a significant problem area addressed? Remarks: 6. Interest to DSP readers (check one - see http://www.elsevier.com/locate/dsp): ___ of great interest to most readers ___ of great interest to a few readers ___ of interest to most readers ___ of little interest to any reader 7. Does the paper contribute (check all that apply): ___ new principles ___ new results ___ valuable review or tutorial treatment ___ other valuable contribution to the subject ___ improved understanding 8. Recommendations (check one): ___ the manuscript should be published in Digital Signal Processing (likely to bring credit to DSP) ___ the manuscript should be published after minor revisions indicated below ___ the manuscript requires major revisions before publication ___ the manuscript should be submitted to another journal, such as ______________________________ ___ the manuscript should not be published (likely to downgrade the status of DSP) Please note that your recommendation and reviewer report are expected to cover the Highlights and Graphical Abstract if submitted with the manuscript. 9. Confidential recommendations for the Editors (please use additional page if needed): -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.164.95.29 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/AfterPhD/M.1489339814.A.EE2.html