Re: [請益] nash equilibrium
看板Economics (經濟學)作者bournetique (bournetique)時間19年前 (2007/05/01 10:21)推噓1(1推 0噓 0→)留言1則, 1人參與討論串2/3 (看更多)
1. dominated strategies are A for player Row and W for player column
2. (10,5) and (8,6) are the NE.
3. (10,5) [as the sum is bigger]
4. There are no dominant strategies. Players will play either one of the NEs.
※ 引述《yyvettee (自己過生活)》之銘言：
: 我可以請教一下下面這個問題嗎 謝謝
: Questions 1 through 4 concern the game matrix given below. Each player has four strategies,
: labeled A, B, C, D for Row and W, X, Y, Z for Column. Row’s payoff is in the upper left hand corner
: of each square. Column’s payoff is in the lower right hand corner.
: Game Matrix for Questions 1 through
: Column
: Strategy W X Y Z
: A 4 4 5 7 8 2 3 9
: Row B 6 1 8 3 9 6 4 1
: C 7 3 4 4 12 1 8 6
: D 3 4 10 5 8 4 6 4
: 1. Which, if any, are the dominated strategies?
: 我是覺得這裡並沒有dominated strategy，請問我有誤解嗎
: 2. What are the Nash equilibria of this game?
: 我找到的是 (10,5) 及 (8,6)?
: 3. Which Nash equilibrium is socially preferable?
: (10,5)?
: 4. Which Nash equilibrium will Row and Column play?
: 這我不知道要怎麼回答，我以為R或C都會play dominant strategy。可是我並不知道
: 是哪個，可以請問一下這個要怎麼判斷嗎？
: 謝謝!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.109.213.135
推
05/01 19:16, , 1F
05/01 19:16, 1F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇)：
Economics 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
8
11