[請益] 計量的causality

看板Economics (經濟學)作者 (= ="frailty..gggg XD)時間16年前 (2009/10/17 14:44), 編輯推噓2(200)
留言2則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/1
出處:http://tinyurl.com/ykbawo6 reg lines from economic data often cannot be given a causal interpretation. The reason being that in the relation of interest between observables and unobservables we might expect they are correlated, whereas in a ^^^^^^^^^^^^ reg model regressors and unobservables are uncorrelated by construction. 請問黃字文意為何? y=xb+e 迴歸假設之一: E[xe]=0 為了得到b的認定. 不懂的是為何 E[xe]!=0 會是expect的條件為了casuality的關係? 謝謝^^" -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.86.136 bcs:轉錄至看板 Statistics 10/17 14:45

10/17 15:06, , 1F
Non stochastic 也可以解釋
10/17 15:06, 1F

10/19 20:14, , 2F
我記得greene的附錄c有證明
10/19 20:14, 2F
文章代碼(AID): #1AsMV9XQ (Economics)
文章代碼(AID): #1AsMV9XQ (Economics)