[請益] 休閒與工作選擇已刪文

看板Economics (經濟學)作者 (混凝土)時間9月前 (), 編輯推噓3(303)
留言6則, 3人參與, 9月前最新討論串1/1
題目:(政大商學院研究所109) Suppose Ethan increases his working hours when obtaining higher hourly pay. following statement(s) is (are) correct? (i) Leisure could be an inferior good to Ethan. (ii) Leisure could be a normal good to Ethan. (iii) Leisure could be a Giffen good to Ethan. A. (i) and (iii) B. (ii) C. (i) and (ii) D. (i), (ii), and (ii) 請教各位高手 請問休閒能當成季芬財分析嗎? 季芬財是劣等財的一種 此題我分析的結果是在此情況下休閒可能為正常、劣等、中性財 季芬財是劣等財的一種 為何答案不能選d呢(補習班答案給c) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.72.222.230 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Economics/M.1610113659.A.74F.html

01/08 23:27, 9月前 , 1F
This question is stupid. The definition of giffe
01/08 23:27, 1F

01/08 23:27, 9月前 , 2F
n good is that holding income constant, as the p
01/08 23:27, 2F

01/08 23:28, 9月前 , 3F
PTT won’t let me answer in multiple comments, c
01/08 23:28, 3F

01/08 23:28, 9月前 , 4F
check your inbox
01/08 23:28, 4F

01/14 07:37, 9月前 , 5F
你跟劣等財搞混了吧
01/14 07:37, 5F

01/14 14:35, 9月前 , 6F
你的邏輯就搞錯了 他是劣等財不代表一是季芬
01/14 14:35, 6F
文章代碼(AID): #1V-69xTF (Economics)
文章代碼(AID): #1V-69xTF (Economics)