Fw: [新聞] 派遣上限 潘世偉主張取消
※ [本文轉錄自 Gossiping 看板 #1HkRQ5ke ]
作者: Renee (Renee) 看板: Gossiping
標題: [新聞] 派遣上限 潘世偉主張取消
時間: Thu Jun 13 20:09:39 2013
派遣上限 潘世偉主張取消
【中央社╱台北13日電】
2013.06.13 06:12 pm
勞委會主委潘世偉今天表示,擬取消派遣比率上限,加重要派公司責任,不僅能保障派遣
權益,正職工反而也不會被取代。
行政院勞工委員會擬將訂出新版派遣勞工保護法專法,內容考慮取消比率上限或採三案(
取消比率、維持舊版比率限制和將外勞、定期契約及派遣工全數納入計算不超過一定比例
)並陳。派遣業改以登記許可制,並主張雇員與正職勞工若屬同一職務及工作內容應同工
同酬,加上設備設施使用權及就業機會資訊權等,都需均等對待。
外界質疑,取消派遣比率限制,正職工恐將被取代。行政院勞工委員會主任委員潘世偉對
此回應說明,舊版派遣專章的比率限制:派遣比率不得超過3%,經勞資會議同意最多不得
超過5%,經工會同意最多不超過20%。潘世偉強調,從現實面考量,訂定這樣派遣比率上
限,其實根本是假象,反而間接促使企業去僱用派遣,這樣才真正是威脅到正職工。
潘世偉主張,在台灣社會勞資不對等、工會力量不夠強大的情況下,很容易就有可能讓工
會同意派遣不超過20%的原則,僱用更多派遣工,「在這樣的情形下,不是反而讓正職工
更容易被取代嗎?」
「反過來說,若派遣工做的工作內容與正職工相同,為何不該與正職工同工同酬?」潘世
偉表示,這是邏輯論述的問題,透過專法要求企業單位負連帶責任,以實際操作面更嚴謹
立法保障派遣工,並取消派遣比率上限,反而更能讓正職工不易被派遣取代,而均等對待
原則也能保障派遣工的權益。
潘世偉說,派遣勞工保護專法目前尚未經過法規會審查,上述都是初步主張及想法,一切
都還有很大溝通協調的討論空間。
http://udn.com/NEWS/BREAKINGNEWS/BREAKINGNEWS9/7961424.shtml
--
有沒有人能解釋一下……上述反白字的邏輯?
--
→
06/13 20:10, , 1F
06/13 20:10, 1F
推
06/13 20:10, , 2F
06/13 20:10, 2F
→
06/13 20:10, , 3F
06/13 20:10, 3F
噓
06/13 20:10, , 4F
06/13 20:10, 4F
推
06/13 20:10, , 5F
06/13 20:10, 5F
→
06/13 20:11, , 6F
06/13 20:11, 6F
噓
06/13 20:11, , 7F
06/13 20:11, 7F
噓
06/13 20:11, , 8F
06/13 20:11, 8F
推
06/13 20:12, , 9F
06/13 20:12, 9F
→
06/13 20:12, , 10F
06/13 20:12, 10F
→
06/13 20:12, , 11F
06/13 20:12, 11F
→
06/13 20:12, , 12F
06/13 20:12, 12F
噓
06/13 20:12, , 13F
06/13 20:12, 13F
噓
06/13 20:12, , 14F
06/13 20:12, 14F
推
06/13 20:13, , 15F
06/13 20:13, 15F
→
06/13 20:13, , 16F
06/13 20:13, 16F
推
06/13 20:13, , 17F
06/13 20:13, 17F
推
06/13 20:13, , 18F
06/13 20:13, 18F
如果待遇跟正職一樣,那為什麼要還有派遣呀???
噓
06/13 20:13, , 19F
06/13 20:13, 19F
→
06/13 20:13, , 20F
06/13 20:13, 20F
→
06/13 20:13, , 21F
06/13 20:13, 21F
→
06/13 20:13, , 22F
06/13 20:13, 22F
→
06/13 20:13, , 23F
06/13 20:13, 23F
→
06/13 20:14, , 24F
06/13 20:14, 24F
→
06/13 20:14, , 25F
06/13 20:14, 25F
噓
06/13 20:14, , 26F
06/13 20:14, 26F
→
06/13 20:14, , 27F
06/13 20:14, 27F
※ 編輯: Renee 來自: 114.38.68.55 (06/13 20:15)
→
06/13 20:14, , 28F
06/13 20:14, 28F
→
06/13 20:14, , 29F
06/13 20:14, 29F
噓
06/13 20:14, , 30F
06/13 20:14, 30F
推
06/13 20:14, , 31F
06/13 20:14, 31F
推
06/13 20:14, , 32F
06/13 20:14, 32F
→
06/13 20:14, , 33F
06/13 20:14, 33F
推
06/13 20:14, , 34F
06/13 20:14, 34F
→
06/13 20:15, , 35F
06/13 20:15, 35F
→
06/13 20:15, , 36F
06/13 20:15, 36F
→
06/13 20:15, , 37F
06/13 20:15, 37F
還有 242 則推文
→
06/14 00:03, , 280F
06/14 00:03, 280F
→
06/14 00:04, , 281F
06/14 00:04, 281F
噓
06/14 00:08, , 282F
06/14 00:08, 282F
噓
06/14 00:10, , 283F
06/14 00:10, 283F
噓
06/14 00:22, , 284F
06/14 00:22, 284F
噓
06/14 00:23, , 285F
06/14 00:23, 285F
→
06/14 00:24, , 286F
06/14 00:24, 286F
噓
06/14 00:27, , 287F
06/14 00:27, 287F
噓
06/14 00:28, , 288F
06/14 00:28, 288F
噓
06/14 00:29, , 289F
06/14 00:29, 289F
噓
06/14 00:42, , 290F
06/14 00:42, 290F
噓
06/14 00:44, , 291F
06/14 00:44, 291F
噓
06/14 00:49, , 292F
06/14 00:49, 292F
→
06/14 00:55, , 293F
06/14 00:55, 293F
→
06/14 01:02, , 294F
06/14 01:02, 294F
→
06/14 01:02, , 295F
06/14 01:02, 295F
推
06/14 01:11, , 296F
06/14 01:11, 296F
噓
06/14 01:14, , 297F
06/14 01:14, 297F
噓
06/14 01:16, , 298F
06/14 01:16, 298F
噓
06/14 01:27, , 299F
06/14 01:27, 299F
→
06/14 01:28, , 300F
06/14 01:28, 300F
→
06/14 01:28, , 301F
06/14 01:28, 301F
→
06/14 01:29, , 302F
06/14 01:29, 302F
噓
06/14 01:37, , 303F
06/14 01:37, 303F
噓
06/14 01:38, , 304F
06/14 01:38, 304F
噓
06/14 01:39, , 305F
06/14 01:39, 305F
噓
06/14 01:39, , 306F
06/14 01:39, 306F
噓
06/14 01:55, , 307F
06/14 01:55, 307F
噓
06/14 02:06, , 308F
06/14 02:06, 308F
噓
06/14 02:07, , 309F
06/14 02:07, 309F
→
06/14 02:08, , 310F
06/14 02:08, 310F
噓
06/14 02:22, , 311F
06/14 02:22, 311F
噓
06/14 02:23, , 312F
06/14 02:23, 312F
噓
06/14 05:55, , 313F
06/14 05:55, 313F
→
06/14 05:57, , 314F
06/14 05:57, 314F
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 轉錄者: azukitw (218.164.13.190), 時間: 06/14/2013 06:01:18
噓
06/15 03:08, , 315F
06/15 03:08, 315F
噓
06/15 03:09, , 316F
06/15 03:09, 316F
噓
06/15 03:09, , 317F
06/15 03:09, 317F
噓
06/15 03:10, , 318F
06/15 03:10, 318F
Employee 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
26
56