[文法] 兩題互相矛盾的國中文法題目

看板Eng-Class (英文板)作者 (each)時間15年前 (2011/01/29 15:39), 編輯推噓3(308)
留言11則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
1. A: Who read you the letter last night? B: _____.  (A) It was Dad. (B) Yes, my mom did (C) No, I didn't read it. (D) My mom does. 為何這題答案可以是(A)? 過去式問句中沒Be動詞只有一般動詞,應該用xx did不是嗎? 還有,這問句的意思是"昨天晚上是誰讀這封信給你聽"對吧? 2. A: Who broke the window? B: ____  (A) It was John. (B) It wasn't me.  (C) Mary did. (D) My young brother does. 而這題的答案(A)卻是錯的,要選(C) 搞的我好亂啊.... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.129.120.205

01/29 19:10, , 1F
1. 這樣解題..太過火了吧 @@
01/29 19:10, 1F

01/29 19:10, , 2F
要以語言自然習慣來看..It was dad. 或 My dad.
01/29 19:10, 2F

01/29 19:11, , 3F
當然,回答 My dad did.也可以.但不是應該或絕對必須這樣答
01/29 19:11, 3F

01/29 19:48, , 4F
我想說第1題的答案給的好爛...
01/29 19:48, 4F

01/29 19:49, , 5F
第1題應該是出現在分裂句的文法中: It was Dad who...
01/29 19:49, 5F

01/29 19:51, , 6F
第2題(A)選項 大概是出題的人忽略了有分裂句的寫法
01/29 19:51, 6F

01/29 22:30, , 7F
分裂句有它的適用場合。事實上這用法的形成是因為*書寫*
01/29 22:30, 7F

01/29 22:30, , 8F
文字無法像(當面)口頭說那樣用語氣/肢體語言強調,所以2
01/29 22:30, 8F

01/29 22:31, , 9F
用It was Dad who .... 反而奇怪。 原PO剩下的問題我回在
01/29 22:31, 9F


01/31 22:29, , 11F
1.答案可以是It was Dad who read the ...或 My Dad did.
01/31 22:29, 11F
文章代碼(AID): #1DGyHELs (Eng-Class)
文章代碼(AID): #1DGyHELs (Eng-Class)