[文法] moving house 為什麼沒用複數?

看板Eng-Class (英文板)作者 (tucson)時間13年前 (2013/01/31 20:43), 編輯推噓0(003)
留言3則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/1
OALD 的例句: http://oald8.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/dictionary/imply The survey implies (that) more people are moving house than was thought. Q 1. 這句話的 house 為什麼不加 s ? Q 2. 原句是否可以等於 The survey implies (that) more people are moving than was thought. 美版的OALD http://oaadonline.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/dictionary/imply 同一句 被改寫成 The survey implies (that) more people are moving away than was thought. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 219.85.202.17 ※ 編輯: tucson 來自: 219.85.202.17 (01/31 20:44)

01/31 20:58, , 1F
move house/home是固定用法 不加s
01/31 20:58, 1F

01/31 21:23, , 2F
原來是英式用法 難怪不熟悉 OALD house上有提到
01/31 21:23, 2F

01/31 21:24, , 3F
下次是否要選OALD美版的來看一下
01/31 21:24, 3F
※ 編輯: tucson 來自: 219.85.202.17 (01/31 21:31)
文章代碼(AID): #1H2cSFbQ (Eng-Class)
文章代碼(AID): #1H2cSFbQ (Eng-Class)