PTT職涯區 / Eng-Class (英文板)

[考題] 高中

看板Eng-Class (英文板)作者 (...)時間12年前 (2014/04/22 08:47), 12年前編輯推噓14(14推 0噓 44→)
留言58則, 8人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
1 There is ______. B) a rumor that a flying saucer was seen last night C) an explanation why the plane crashed 答案是B，但C錯在哪兒?百思不得其解 2 Mr. Wang was the manager ____ interviewed me for this job. C) , who D) who 答案是C，如果那家公司有二個經理以上，D是不是也可以阿 3 ____ to argue with Barry; he is very stubborn. C) There is no use to try D) There is not much use trying 答案是D，這有固定用法嗎，C 我唸起來也很順@@ 4 ___ about the potential danger of using unclear energy, they are calling on scientists to develop renewable forms of energy. B) Worrying C) Worried 答案是C，但我查過字典，Don't worry about the matter, take it easy.有Vi的 用法，所以B是不是也可以? 5 If Sue accepted Kenny's proposal last year, they ___ married for three months tomorrow. D) would have been 這一題我我用排錯選的，因為其它答案都很離譜，但我不是很了解這個用法。 是否有其它形式的寫法，例如，~had accepted~，they would be ~ 或 ~had accepted~, they will have been ~等等 感激不盡，叩謝各位大大 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.143.200.153 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1398127668.A.387.html
推
04/22 09:17, , 1F
第1題的C選項，應該要 "an explanation for why the
04/22 09:17, 1F
→
04/22 09:17, , 2F
plane crashed 才對，要加 for
04/22 09:17, 2F
推
04/22 09:42, , 3F
2.不行，要選B的話是 XX was "the" manager who .........
04/22 09:42, 3F
→
04/22 09:45, , 4F
對不起，我少打the，我改一下Orz
04/22 09:45, 4F
※ 編輯: ambrosio (220.143.200.153), 04/22/2014 09:45:20
→
04/22 09:45, , 5F
3. 選C是 There is no use "trying" to argue
04/22 09:45, 5F
→
04/22 09:47, , 6F
呃，你拿答案來回答我的問題?你的意思是這是慣用語?
04/22 09:47, 6F
推
04/22 10:05, , 7F
我沒學過文法，但就是沒有你說的這種用法
04/22 10:05, 7F
推
04/22 10:10, , 8F
4. 不行
04/22 10:10, 8F
推
04/22 10:20, , 9F
5.沒其他寫法，要用would be你要敘述現代的事情才行
04/22 10:20, 9F
→
04/22 10:31, , 10F
謝謝你，那請問if子句用，had accepted可以嗎
04/22 10:31, 10F
推
04/22 10:34, , 11F
It's no use crying over spilt milk.賣牛奶女孩的故事
04/22 10:34, 11F
→
04/22 10:34, , 12F
這句背起來 以後碰到no use的題都會解了 要用不定詞
04/22 10:34, 12F
→
04/22 10:35, , 13F
要改成 It's useless to cry...
04/22 10:35, 13F
推
04/22 11:54, , 14F
第二題個人以為兩個都ok 意思不同而已
04/22 11:54, 14F
推
04/22 11:58, , 15F
第四題，兩種用法意思不一樣，I worry about you 是指
04/22 11:58, 15F
推
04/22 11:58, , 16F
事實，I'm worried about you , 是只當下的情況，此題針
04/22 11:58, 16F
→
04/22 11:58, , 17F
對某件事情故選worried
04/22 11:58, 17F
→
04/22 12:51, , 18F
第四題的解釋，聽不太懂，我給的字典例句不也是針對某件
04/22 12:51, 18F
→
04/22 12:51, , 19F
事情嗎@@
04/22 12:51, 19F
推
04/22 13:16, , 20F
5. would have這個句型是與現在事實相反的假設用法
04/22 13:16, 20F
→
04/22 13:22, , 21F
4. worry about跟be worried about兩種用法，意思有點不
04/22 13:22, 21F
→
04/22 13:23, , 22F
太相同。前者是敘述一種普遍、長期的現象，例如
04/22 13:23, 22F
→
04/22 13:25, , 23F
"Parents worry about their children even if they
04/22 13:25, 23F
→
04/22 13:28, , 24F
grow up"；而後者比較用來敘述一個特定的事件，例如
04/22 13:28, 24F
→
04/22 13:33, , 25F
"The students protesting against the trade
04/22 13:33, 25F
→
04/22 13:34, , 26F
agreement with China are worried that the
04/22 13:34, 26F
推
04/22 13:36, , 27F
would have 應該是與過去事實相反的假設喔，would 才是
04/22 13:36, 27F
→
04/22 13:36, , 28F
與現在事實相反的假設
04/22 13:36, 28F
→
04/22 13:36, , 29F
president would ignore people's voice and have the
04/22 13:36, 29F
→
04/22 13:37, , 30F
law passed"。意思有些微的不一樣。
04/22 13:37, 30F
→
04/22 13:40, , 31F
對，謝謝comeandgo更正。
04/22 13:40, 31F
推
04/22 13:47, , 32F
不過第五題我自己以為應該要用had accepted 才對 @@
04/22 13:47, 32F
→
04/22 13:52, , 33F
請問既然是與過去事實相反，後面為什麼會接tomorrow?
04/22 13:52, 33F
推
04/22 13:55, , 34F
have 視為完成式動詞，要到明天才滿三個月
04/22 13:55, 34F
→
04/22 13:55, , 35F
這不衝突吧？「如果我大一大二時沒有沉迷社團，我下個月
04/22 13:55, 35F
→
04/22 13:56, , 36F
就可以順利畢業而不會延畢了。」
04/22 13:56, 36F
→
04/22 13:57, , 37F
嗯，大概了解了，感恩~
04/22 13:57, 37F
推
04/22 14:04, , 38F
2.有無逗號都對 但在此唯指一位姓王的經理 沒有其他姓
04/22 14:04, 38F
→
04/22 14:04, , 39F
王的來面試他 故字句為非限定修飾所以要加逗號
04/22 14:04, 39F
→
04/22 14:04, , 40F
3.it is no use ving / it is useless to v / it is of
04/22 14:04, 40F
→
04/22 14:04, , 41F
no use to v
04/22 14:04, 41F
→
04/23 01:40, , 42F
5. 題目少了 had -- 和過去事實相反(由last year點出)要搭
04/23 01:40, 42F
→
04/23 01:40, , 43F
配 had accepted。had不能省
04/23 01:40, 43F
→
04/23 01:40, , 44F
（和subjunctive有關的）「字樣」上呈現"would have p.p."
04/23 01:40, 44F
→
04/23 01:41, , 45F
不是只有「和過去事實相反」。和現在(/未來)事實相反的也
04/23 01:41, 45F
→
04/23 01:41, , 46F
有: they will have been married for three months
04/23 01:41, 46F
→
04/23 01:41, , 47F
tommorow. (indicative)
04/23 01:41, 47F
→
04/23 01:42, , 48F
-> they would have been married for three months
04/23 01:42, 48F
→
04/23 01:42, , 49F
tomorrow. (subjunctive)
04/23 01:42, 49F
→
04/23 01:42, , 50F
這裡的"have been married"是和for three months配合的「
04/23 01:42, 50F
→
04/23 01:43, , 51F
持續一段時間」的完成式
04/23 01:43, 51F
→
04/23 01:43, , 52F
真的要用If Sue accepted ...(這時候「不是」subjunctive)
04/23 01:43, 52F
→
04/23 01:44, , 53F
那麼後頭搭配的其實是will have been married .. tomorrow
04/23 01:44, 53F
→
04/23 01:44, , 54F
但是這樣子的出題沒太大意義(所以我才說題目漏了 had, 應
04/23 01:44, 54F
→
04/23 01:44, , 55F
該是考subjunctive)
04/23 01:44, 55F
→
04/23 01:45, , 56F
一個"合適"的(indicative)例子: http://ppt.cc/ZSLq
04/23 01:45, 56F
→
04/23 03:09, , 57F
1. C 也對 http://ppt.cc/Cmmv CJ 的回答品質不錯
04/23 03:09, 57F
→
04/23 09:35, , 58F
thanks ^^
04/23 09:35, 58F
‣ 更多 ambrosio 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1JLRmqE7 (Eng-Class)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇)：
排序： 最新先 | 最舊先 | 留言數
3
16
[考題] 高中
ambrosio
12年前, 04/24
14
58
[考題] 高中
ambrosio
12年前, 04/22
在新視窗開啟完整討論串 (共2篇)
Eng-Class 近期熱門文章
更多 近期熱門文章 >>
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
更多 即時熱門文章 >>
‣ 更多 ambrosio 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1JLRmqE7 (Eng-Class)