Re: [文法] used to與過去簡單式
再請教一題練習題
看Azar的文法書，Understanding and Using English Grammar（藍皮那本）
有提及would與used to的差異，
練習題中說，兩者都可的情況請填would，但某些情況只能用used to的，請填used to
其中第9題，題目如右 http://ppt.cc/OUXH
答案給 used to
這我有點疑惑，因為在用手電筒看漫畫書這不是可以一直反覆發生嗎？
為何不能用would來代替呢？
另外，Yesterday once more這首歌詞，有這麼一句，
When I was young. I'd listen to the radio.
此句歌詞中，就是用would來表示反覆發生聽收音機的這件事，
那為何不能用would來表示反覆用手電筒看漫畫書的這件事呢？
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.40.234.25
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1424323706.A.DBC.html
→
02/19 16:26, , 1F
02/19 16:26, 1F
→
02/19 16:26, , 2F
02/19 16:26, 2F
→
02/19 16:27, , 3F
02/19 16:27, 3F
→
02/19 21:46, , 4F
02/19 21:46, 4F
→
02/19 21:46, , 5F
02/19 21:46, 5F
→
02/19 21:50, , 6F
02/19 21:50, 6F
→
02/19 21:51, , 7F
02/19 21:51, 7F
→
02/19 21:51, , 8F
02/19 21:51, 8F
→
02/19 21:52, , 9F
02/19 21:52, 9F
→
02/21 02:22, , 10F
02/21 02:22, 10F
→
02/21 02:22, , 11F
02/21 02:22, 11F
→
02/21 02:25, , 12F
02/21 02:25, 12F
→
02/21 02:26, , 13F
02/21 02:26, 13F
→
02/21 02:27, , 14F
02/21 02:27, 14F
→
02/21 02:27, , 15F
02/21 02:27, 15F
→
02/21 02:28, , 16F
02/21 02:28, 16F
→
02/21 02:28, , 17F
02/21 02:28, 17F
→
02/21 02:29, , 18F
02/21 02:29, 18F
→
02/21 02:36, , 19F
02/21 02:36, 19F
→
02/21 02:36, , 20F
02/21 02:36, 20F
→
02/21 02:40, , 21F
02/21 02:40, 21F
→
02/21 02:40, , 22F
02/21 02:40, 22F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇)：
Eng-Class 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章