[文法] 這句話裡的that的意思？（已解）

看板Eng-Class (英文板)作者scju (QQ)時間9年前 (2016/07/30 22:31)推噓2(2推 0噓 28→)

留言30則, 3人參與討論串1/1

大家好，請教兩個問題：一、 The phrase “$64 dollar question” became a catchword to the point that it ^^^^ 這個that子句如何還原？ became the program's name, and people applied the phrase to any very important question question or matter. 是這樣嗎： it became the program's name to the point , and people applied the phrase to ^^^^^^^^^^^^ 還原到這裡 any very important question... 還是說那個that是名詞子句的關係詞，後面的子句是the point的同位語？另外請問一下，to the point在這裡要如何翻譯呢？ --- 二、 Even more popular was the 1950s television spinoff, The $64,000 Question, with the phrase, now adjusted to inflation, catching on in popular speech, but not to the extent that its antecedent did. 請問這一句中間的The $64,000 Question, with the phrase, now adjusted to inflation是否通通可當插入句來看，可省為： Even more popular was the 1950s television spinoff, but not to the extent that its antecedent did. 後面形容詞子句that可還原為： its antecedent did the extent.(還是...did to the extent？) （要怎麼判斷先行詞有沒有含to呢？例一的to the point也是）前半部可視為倒裝，所以也可還原： the 1950s television spinoff was Even more popular... 請問各位，感謝！ --- 原文出處 http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/%2464+question $64 question The essential or ultimate question. One of the most popular radio quiz shows during the 1940s was Take It or Leave It in which contestants strived to answer question after question until they reached the top prize of sixty-four silver dollars. The questions increased in difficulty, and at any point contestants could choose to stop and keep the amount of money they had won to that point. The phrase “$64 dollar question” became a catchword to the point that it became the program's name, and people applied the phrase to any very important question or matter. Even more popular was the 1950s television spinoff, The $64,000 Question, with the phrase, now adjusted to inflation, catching on in popular speech, but not to the extent that its antecedent did. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.248.151.86 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1469889079.A.B4F.html ※ 編輯: scju (111.248.151.86), 07/30/2016 23:17:52

推

vincentman

07/31 00:16, , 1^F

07/31 00:16, 1^F

推

vincentman

07/31 00:19, , 2^F

07/31 00:19, 2^F

→

vincentman

07/31 00:20, , 3^F

07/31 00:20, 3^F

→

vincentman

07/31 00:20, , 4^F

07/31 00:20, 4^F

→

vincentman

07/31 00:22, , 5^F

07/31 00:22, 5^F

→

vincentman

07/31 00:23, , 6^F

07/31 00:23, 6^F

→

vincentman

07/31 00:25, , 7^F

07/31 00:25, 7^F

→

vincentman

07/31 00:27, , 8^F

07/31 00:27, 8^F

→

vincentman

07/31 00:31, , 9^F

07/31 00:31, 9^F

→

vincentman

07/31 00:32, , 10^F

07/31 00:32, 10^F

→

kaifrankwind

07/31 01:10, , 11^F

07/31 01:10, 11^F

→

kaifrankwind

07/31 01:10, , 12^F

07/31 01:10, 12^F

喔喔，原來如此，找到三個辭典的說明，供各位參考 --- 朗文辭典 that (conjunction.) (formal) in order that something may happen or someone may do something: Give us strength that we may stand against them. (確實如V大所言，這裡的that=in order that=so that。也感謝K大，的確是「因此..」，帶出後面的結果) --- The New Oxford Dictionary of English 1. introducing a subordinate clause expressing a statement or hypothesis 1.1 expressing a reason or cause: he seemed pleased that I wanted to continue 1.2 expressing a result: she was so tired that she couldn't think. 1.3 (usu. with modal) expressing a purpose, hope, or intention we pray that the coming year may be a year of peace I eat that I may live. --- Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (1) —used as a function word to introduce a subordinate clause expressing purpose or desired result: cutting down expenses that her son might inherit an unencumbered estate. (2) —used as a function word to introduce a subordinate clause expressing a reason or cause: rejoice that you are lightened of a load — Robert Browning (3) —used as a function word to introduce a subordinate clause expressing consequence, result, or effect: are of sufficient importance that they cannot be neglected — Hannah Wormington ---- 另外，這句 Even more popular was the 1950s television spinoff, but not to the extent that its antecedent did. 後面形容詞子句that還原，查了一下google，我判斷是這樣比較合理： its antecedent did the extent. 有誤請指正，感謝！ ※ 編輯: scju (114.32.32.215), 07/31/2016 20:36:57

→