[文法] around which

看板Eng-Class (英文板)作者scju (QQ)時間8年前 (2017/09/30 22:04)推噓1(1推 0噓 17→)

留言18則, 3人參與討論串1/1

大家好，想請教兩個問題： ----------- 1. 'Finding Meaning'. Actually, there is nothing especially important in recognizing or inferring a topic sentence for its own sake. The important thing is that the reader use the topic sentence as a quick means of establishing a focal point around which to cluster the meanings of the subsequent words and sentences that he or she reads. Here's the double-edged sword again: just as writers use topic sentences to provide focus and structure for presenting their meaning, so the perceptive reader can use the topic sentence for focus and structure to gain meaning. https://i.imgur.com/WwayLrC.jpg

-------- 上述內容出自 six-way paragraphs前言第八頁，想問的是這句當中around which的用法 The important thing is that the reader use the topic sentence as a quick means of establishing a focal point around which to cluster the meanings of the subsequent words and sentences that he or she reads. ------ which後面不是應該接一個子句嗎？但這裡卻是接不定詞片語？我將其還原如下： 1. a focal point 2. to cluster the meanings of the subsequent words and sentences that he or she reads around the focal point 請問這樣理解對嗎？因為沒有看過which後面是接不定詞片語的。＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝ 2. Finally, a paragraph may not have a topic sentence in it at all. Some writers purposely leave out such sentences. But, in such cases, inferring a topic sentence may not be as difficult as it may first appear. Here's why. Many such professional writers actually do write topic sentences, but on separate scraps of paper. They then place one of the scraps at the head of a sheet and use the topic sentence to guide their thoughts in the construction of the paragraph. With the paragraph written and the topic sentence having served its purpose, the scrap is discarded. The end result is a paragraph without a visible topic sentence, but the paragraph, nonetheless, has embedded in it all the clues that an alert reader needs for making an accurate inference. https://i.imgur.com/76mpByA.jpg

------------ 出自前言第七頁。想請教，這裡第一行說：「一個段落裡頭可能完全沒有主題句」，但馬上又接著說：「但在這類情況裡，想推論出主題句，可能不像它第一次出現那樣困難」，這樣講不是前後矛盾嗎？既然沒有主題句，又怎麼推論得出來？（頂多只能說主題句的意思隱含在某些句子裡吧？）如果沒有主題句，又怎麼會有「第一次出現」呢？（還是說它的意思是，第一次有主題句，後來就隱藏在某些句子裡了？）以上請教，謝謝！ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.32.32.215 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1506780281.A.853.html ※ 編輯: scju (114.32.32.215), 09/30/2017 22:05:38 ※ 編輯: scju (114.32.32.215), 09/30/2017 22:06:51

→

dunchee

09/30 22:17, 8年前 , 1^F

09/30 22:17, 1^F

→

dunchee

09/30 22:25, 8年前 , 2^F

09/30 22:25, 2^F

→

dunchee

09/30 22:25, 8年前 , 3^F

09/30 22:25, 3^F