[請益] narrowly rejected
大家好
在這篇文章 https://tinyurl.com/y3rkrhep 中看到以下這段
Nonetheless, says Tench of the EIA, Namibia’s rhinos are at risk from
poaching, which has intensified since 2014. The proposal was narrowly
rejected in a 39-82 vote.
這個提案是「將southern white rhinos 從Appendix I 移至Appendix II」
請問為什麼39-82 的投票數是narrowly rejected?
查了這個會議的議事規則(https://tinyurl.com/y2oqma98)
裡面有寫到2/3 是通過的標準
但以我的理解 此提案要通過
應該是需要得到同意票的2/3, 所以反對票略高於2/3 , 反而是被大力地反對了
所以無法理解這邊使用narrowly rejected 的原因
請教大家的意見了
謝謝
補充議事規則：
Rule 28 Majority
1. Except where otherwise provided for under the provisions of the
Convention, these Rules or
the Terms of Reference for the Administration of the Trust Fund, all votes on
procedural matters
relating to the conduct of the business of the meeting shall be decided by a
simple majority of
the Representatives present and voting, while all other decisions shall be taken by a two-thirds
majority of Representatives present and voting.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 165.225.116.179 (美國)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1570081260.A.086.html
※ 編輯: agricultural (165.225.116.179 美國), 10/03/2019 13:42:44
推
10/03 17:49,
6年前
, 1F
10/03 17:49, 1F
→
10/03 17:49,
6年前
, 2F
10/03 17:49, 2F
→
10/03 18:29,
6年前
, 3F
10/03 18:29, 3F
→
10/03 18:29,
6年前
, 4F
10/03 18:29, 4F
推
10/03 18:34,
6年前
, 5F
10/03 18:34, 5F
→
10/03 18:35,
6年前
, 6F
10/03 18:35, 6F
→
10/03 18:36,
6年前
, 7F
10/03 18:36, 7F
→
10/03 18:36,
6年前
, 8F
10/03 18:36, 8F
→
10/03 18:36,
6年前
, 9F
10/03 18:36, 9F
→
10/03 18:36,
6年前
, 10F
10/03 18:36, 10F
→
10/03 18:37,
6年前
, 11F
10/03 18:37, 11F
→
10/03 18:38,
6年前
, 12F
10/03 18:38, 12F
→
10/03 18:38,
6年前
, 13F
10/03 18:38, 13F
→
10/03 18:38,
6年前
, 14F
10/03 18:38, 14F
→
10/03 18:49,
6年前
, 15F
10/03 18:49, 15F
→
10/03 19:05,
6年前
, 16F
10/03 19:05, 16F
→
11/07 11:03,
6年前
, 17F
11/07 11:03, 17F
Eng-Class 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
