[文法] what 的用法
大家好，今天在 New York Times看到一句話：
Thousands of supporters of Brazil’s former president, Jair Bolsonaro, broke
into government buildings yesterday to protest what they falsely claim was a
stolen election.
請問此句後方的 "what they falsely claim was a stolen election"
為什麼不是寫成： "what they falsely claim to be/as a stolen election"
或是直接把 was 刪除， 變成 “what they falsely claim a stolen election"
這樣原句裡 what 作為插入句，裡頭不就有兩個動詞 claim 和 was
我會這樣理解，是因為類似的句子像是：
"If she wants to learn to do what she calls 'useful things'...
這裡的 what she calls 後面也沒加 are。
不知道該怎麼理解 "what they falsely claim was" 這樣的文法(看起來有2個動詞)?
謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.140.174.65 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1673374346.A.317.html
推
01/11 10:32,
1年前
, 1F
01/11 10:32, 1F
→
01/11 10:32,
1年前
, 2F
01/11 10:32, 2F
謝謝，但有點困惑的是，為什麼 "if she wants to learn to do what she calls useful
things, I think it is best..."
此處calls後面為什麼不用加are?
※ 編輯: incredible (223.140.174.65 臺灣), 01/11/2023 13:00:34
→
01/11 21:56,
1年前
, 3F
01/11 21:56, 3F
→
01/11 21:56,
1年前
, 4F
01/11 21:56, 4F
→
01/11 21:56,
1年前
, 5F
01/11 21:56, 5F
→
01/11 21:56,
1年前
, 6F
01/11 21:56, 6F
→
01/11 21:56,
1年前
, 7F
01/11 21:56, 7F
→
01/11 21:57,
1年前
, 8F
01/11 21:57, 8F
→
01/11 22:08,
1年前
, 9F
01/11 22:08, 9F
→
01/11 22:08,
1年前
, 10F
01/11 22:08, 10F
→
01/11 22:09,
1年前
, 11F
01/11 22:09, 11F
推
01/12 11:25,
1年前
, 12F
01/12 11:25, 12F
Eng-Class 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
