Re: [Talk] Game Theory
看板EngTalk (全英文聊天)作者demonderrick (Derrick)時間19年前 (2005/10/13 17:10)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則, 0人參與討論串5/9 (看更多)
The prisoner delimma is the point from the teacher of John Nash...
His idea is:
If A admit the crime with good will, he might go for prison for 3 years.
If A doesn't admit the crime, then he may have to go for 6 years...
or A doesn't and he might not even be charged...
But the thing is, you have to think that if B will admit the crime or not.
if B admit the crime, but A don't... then A go for 6 years, B for 3 years.
If B doesn't admit the crime, but A does, then A go for 3 and B for 6 years.
Of course, if both A and B doesn't admit the crime.. then both for nothing.
it is like a game... people don't tend to think that another party will do the best way..
so, A or B will at least one to admit the crime (mostly)
And, this is the game that cops play nowaday ;)
I hope this helps a bit :D
this is getting more interesting now..
: Wow!! Um, that was quite overwelming...
: I think I get the basic idea anyway. But just one question, it might be
: totally irrelevant, but why is it that those boxes remind me a lot of what
: I remember is called "prisoners delimma"???
: Anyone know anything about that?! @@
: Well, so can the game theory actually be converted into some kind of a game
: that we can play?? Or am I missing the point again.............. :P
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 211.21.104.51
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 9 篇)：
EngTalk 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
