[語文] GWD-26-14

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 ( 我一直都很認真)時間16年前 (2008/05/27 23:17), 編輯推噓6(602)
留言8則, 6人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Q14: In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, (arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights) and for changes in the married women’s property laws. A. arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights B. arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women C. a treatise that advocates women’s equal political and legal rights D. a treatise advocating women’s equal political and legal rights E. a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women 答案為E。 這題在寫的時候用平行解出E。 但剛剛突然想到,treatise可以argue嗎? 若treatise不能argue,則答案就可能要選B了? 所以,treatise到底可不可以argue?? 物品也可以argue嗎? 希望有大師指點! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.134.226.214

05/27 23:47, , 1F
A.B不合邏輯,因為published出版的動作 不能引導argue的結果
05/27 23:47, 1F

05/27 23:51, , 2F
argue的主詞要人或是文章
05/27 23:51, 2F

05/28 01:04, , 3F
那請問C,D為什麼會錯?
05/28 01:04, 3F

05/28 01:05, , 4F
argue是主張 人或文章都可以主張
05/28 01:05, 4F

05/28 01:13, , 5F
to樓樓上,C,D與未畫線部分for changes不平行。
05/28 01:13, 5F

05/28 12:13, , 6F
同樓上,CD 是 Parallel 型錯誤
05/28 12:13, 6F

06/06 03:29, , 7F
argue:to state, giving clear reasons, that s/t is true
06/06 03:29, 7F

06/06 03:29, , 8F
,should be doneetc.
06/06 03:29, 8F
文章代碼(AID): #18F2NuW2 (GMAT)
文章代碼(AID): #18F2NuW2 (GMAT)