[問題] CR問題2

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (風)時間16年前 (2008/06/03 22:02), 編輯推噓2(204)
留言6則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the expot of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants.If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years. which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? 答案是 (E)A lack of profitale crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities 也是想不透為什麼這個是答案... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.115.218.219

06/03 22:17, , 1F
因為題目說政府無法達成降低城市失業率,E說失業的人到城市
06/03 22:17, 1F

06/03 22:17, , 2F
所以城市失業率仍然是下降的
06/03 22:17, 2F

06/03 22:26, , 3F
就算不取消關稅,農民在利潤太少的情況下,出走到城市
06/03 22:26, 3F

06/03 22:27, , 4F
如此一來,跟取消關稅相比,同樣也無法降低失業率
06/03 22:27, 4F

06/03 22:28, , 5F
我覺得問題出在 "農民跑到城市後 失業率更會提高" 這一點
06/03 22:28, 5F

06/04 00:38, , 6F
了解!!感謝!!
06/04 00:38, 6F
文章代碼(AID): #18HKxsKU (GMAT)
文章代碼(AID): #18HKxsKU (GMAT)