[語文]GWD 32-Q1 CR

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (信將)時間17年前 (2008/12/06 01:46), 編輯推噓1(105)
留言6則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Q3: GWD32-Q1 The cause of the wreck of the ship Edmund Fitzgeraid in a severe storm on lake Superior is still unknown , when the sunken wreckage of the vessel was found, searchers discovered the hull in two pieces lying close together, The storm’s violent waves would have caused separate pieces floating even briefly on the surface to drift apart. Therefore, the breakup of the null can be ruled out as the cause of the sinking. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? A.Ships as large as the Edmund Fitzgerald rarely sink except in the most violent weather. B.Under water currents at the time of the storm did not move the separated pieces of the hull together again. C.Pieces of the hull would have sunk more quickly than the intact hull would have D.The waves of the storm were not violent enough to have caused the breakup E.If the ship broke up before sinking , the pieces of the hull would not have remained on the surface for very long AND:(B) 我這題寫對 但是 我是刪掉了其他四個 才選(B)的 因此不清楚他們的邏輯關係 請大大們指教 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.127.197.112

12/06 09:10, , 1F
題目原意是發現兩塊靠在一起的船殼 但照理說暴風雨
12/06 09:10, 1F

12/06 09:11, , 2F
來時的海浪應該足以將兩者分開才是
12/06 09:11, 2F

12/06 09:12, , 3F
因此推論船殼的分裂將排除是因為下沉的關係
12/06 09:12, 3F

12/06 09:13, , 4F
所以焦點擺在wave(因)和hull(果)上
12/06 09:13, 4F

12/06 09:15, , 5F
b排除了造成hull靠在一起是海浪造成的原因
12/06 09:15, 5F

12/06 21:27, , 6F
謝謝^^
12/06 21:27, 6F
文章代碼(AID): #19EMZW5F (GMAT)
文章代碼(AID): #19EMZW5F (GMAT)