Re: [語文] 想問幾題CR,請各位大大幫忙解說一下, …
※ 引述《kimoqueen (AT苦海何時能解脫~ @_@)》之銘言:
: 73. There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially
: confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the
: confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific findings, namely,
: the replication of results by other scientists.
: Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientists,
: which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud,
: is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other
: scientists conduct experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results.
: Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?
: (A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before
: they are replicated.
: (B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted
: to peer review before publication.
: (C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to
: the scrutiny of replication.
: (D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.
: (E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.
: Answer: A
這題我不了 選不出答案 A怎麼解釋都很怪
: ____________________________________________________________________________
: Questions 78-79
: Despite improvements in treatment for asthma, the death rate from this
: disease has doubled during the past decade from its previous rate.
: Two possible explanations for this increase have been offered. First,
: the recording of deaths due to asthma has become more widespread and
: accurate in the past decade than it had been previously.
: Second, there has been an increase in urban pollution.
以下開始是重點
: However, since the rate of deaths due to asthma has increased dramatically
: even in cities with long-standing,
: comprehensive medical records and with little or no urban pollution,
這裡說上面兩點都不對
: one must instead conclude that the cause of increased deaths is the use
: of bronchial inhalers by asthma sufferers to relieve their symptoms.
這裡說作者認為的原因--bronchial inhalers是生病的重要因素
: 78. Each of the following, if true, provides support to the argument EXCEPT:
要找支持作者的論點 也就是反駁two possible explanations
: (A) Urban populations have doubled in the past decade.
這解釋作者不支持
: (B) Records of asthma deaths are as accurate for the past twenty years
: as for the past ten years.
反駁解釋
: (C) Evidence suggests that inhalers make the lungs more sensitive to
: irritation by airborne pollen.
支持論點
: (D) By temporarily relieving the symptoms of asthma, inhalers encourage
: sufferers to avoid more beneficial measures.
支持論點
: (E) Ten years ago bronchial inhalers were not available as an asthma treatment.
支持論點
: Answer: A
: 79. Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
: (A) Urban pollution has not doubled in the past decade.
無關
: (B) Doctors and patients generally ignore the role of allergies in asthma.
無關
: (C) Bronchial inhalers are unsafe, even when used according to the
: recommended instructions.
不像是assumption 像support
: (D) The use of bronchial inhalers aggravates other diseases that
: frequently occur among asthma sufferers and that often lead to fatal
: outcomes even when the asthma itself does not.
比較不像是assumption 比較像是support
: (E) Increased urban pollution, improved recording of asthma deaths,
: and the used of asthma deaths, and the use of bronchial inhalers are the
: only possible explanations of the increased death rate due to asthma.
假設就只有這幾個原因 不會天外飛來一個"另有他因" 所以反駁完explanations就ok
: Answer: E
這是我的看法 歡迎指教
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.70.208.217
推
12/16 16:52, , 1F
12/16 16:52, 1F
→
12/16 16:52, , 2F
12/16 16:52, 2F
→
12/16 16:53, , 3F
12/16 16:53, 3F
→
12/16 16:56, , 4F
12/16 16:56, 4F
→
12/16 17:03, , 5F
12/16 17:03, 5F
→
12/16 17:04, , 6F
12/16 17:04, 6F
推
12/16 17:29, , 7F
12/16 17:29, 7F
※ 編輯: Anero 來自: 219.70.208.217 (12/16 18:14)
→
12/16 18:19, , 8F
12/16 18:19, 8F
GMAT 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章