[SC. ] OG16 37

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者brain2906 (B)時間8年前 (2016/12/15 00:08)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串1/1

Not trusting themselves to choose wisely among the wide array of investment opportunities on the market, "stockbrokers are helping many people who turn to them to buy stocks that could be easily" bought directly. (A) stockbrokers are helping many people who turn to them to buy stocks that could be easily (B) stockbrokers are helping many people who are turning to them for helpin buying stocks that they could easily have (C) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help from them to buy stocks that could be easily (D) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help to buy stocks that easily could have been (E) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help in buying stocks that could easily be 針對這題有些疑問想了解 1. easily 的位置問題 A選項官方版的解釋the adverb easily is misplaced in the phrase could be easily bought. 但正確答案E選項could easily be bought 而D選項easily could have been bought 官方版沒對easily 位置做出解釋自己的想法是easily作為副詞修飾動詞，所以應該修飾位置離bought較近所以D選項會錯，另外因為be bought 是強調被動必須放在一起，導致A選項的 easily插在be bought中間，所以錯，不知道這樣正不正確 2. D選項to buy及E選項in buying 官方版解釋對D選項To buy is not idiomatic in this context—in buying would be correct 從題目的句意中也可了解並不是明顯的"表目的" 不知道官方認為不好的原因正是因為to帶有目的意味，但many people只是單純因為不相信自己的聰明才智而去尋求stockbrokers的幫助，而不是有目的性的求助不知道這樣解釋正不正確另外想確認in buying這裡是介係詞片語做副詞修飾(are turning to stockbrokers for help)這個動作嗎? 希望有大神可以批判一下這樣的思路是不是正確的非常感謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.163.24.174 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/GMAT/M.1481731682.A.5F4.html