[討論] argument no.144

看板GRE (GRE入學考試)作者t131 (juju)時間17年前 (2007/03/29 22:14)推噓2(2推 0噓 1→)

留言3則, 2人參與討論串1/1

題目如下 'The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee. "We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rather than admit men into its programs. It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguing that it would encourage more students to apply to Grove. But eighty percent of the students responding to a survey conducted by the student government wanted the school to remain all female, and over half of the alumni who answered a separate survey also opposed coeducation. Keeping the college all-female, therefore, will improve morale among students and convince alumni to keep supporting the college financially." 中文大意: 我們建議Grove College維持只收女性學生而非男性學生的世紀傳統。雖然大多數的教職人員都偏向男女共校，說這樣可以鼓勵更多的學生申請就讀於格羅夫學院。但是有百分之八十的學生回應說都希望保持只收女性的傳統，並且超過一半的校友也表示他們反對男女共校。所以，如果我們繼續維持這項傳統，我們可以增進學生的道德觀念並且可以說服我們的校友持續對本校的捐款貢獻。我的問題: 一開始題目先說"大多數的教職人員都偏向男女共校，說這樣可以鼓勵更多的學生申請就讀於格羅夫學院。" 而最後作者的結論是要反駁這句話，因為能夠維持女校。那請問我們要反駁一開始的這句話嗎? 因為如果反駁了這句話，就不算是反駁作者了? 有時候題目會先給一個敘述(1) 然後作者要反駁敘述(1)而另外說了敘述(2) 如果是要反駁作者的話應該就是要支持敘述(1)反駁敘述(2) 但如果敘述(1)也有邏輯問題的話那我們也要列出來嗎? 最後....請問大家看的懂我在問什麼嗎 = = -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 163.25.115.169