Re: [字彙] 填充求教 謝謝

看板GRE (GRE入學考試)作者 (loveusomuch)時間17年前 (2007/06/06 18:31), 編輯推噓2(201)
留言3則, 2人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
※ 引述《leiyy (年年)》之銘言: : 1. How could words, confined as they individually are to certain...are to : certain....meanings specified in a dictionary, eventually come, when combined : in groups, to creat obscurity and actually to prevent thought from being....? : a) indefinite....articulate : b) conventional...conceivable : c) unlikely...classified : d) archaic...expressed : e) precise...communicable : A: E 字單獨的時候是 ____ 字併在一起的時候是模糊不清 and prevent ____ how could開頭 前後反義 所以兩格都要填清楚精確之類的字 選E : 2. Even thouht they tended to be....strangers, fifteenth-century Europeans : did not automatically associate....znd danger. : a) tusting of....diversity : b) haughty with...nonconformity : c) interested in...enmity : d) antagnoistic to...rudeness : e) hostile to...foreignness : A:E even though開頭 前後反義 後面 do not...danger 所以前面 討厭 有敵意 to 陌生人 後面那格 都出現strangers了也只有 foreignness : 3. The modern age is a permissive one in which things can be said explicitly, : but the old tradition of ...dies hard. : a) agrrulousness : b) exaggeration : c) excoriation : d) bombost : e) euphemism : A:E : 麻煩版上高手提點一下 謝謝 but 前後反義 前面 講清楚 後面 講話 ____ 的習慣不消失 只能填不清楚 => E 婉轉 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.113.139.49

06/07 10:10, , 1F
後半 did not associate....
06/07 10:10, 1F

06/07 10:10, , 2F
那麼前半不就該為 associate ? (A)(C)?
06/07 10:10, 2F

06/07 10:13, , 3F
後面還有danger你漏看了
06/07 10:13, 3F
文章代碼(AID): #16Peppoo (GRE)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #16Peppoo (GRE)