[問題] argument一題的攻擊論點

看板GRE (GRE入學考試)作者 (西恩)時間17年前 (2009/04/28 18:04), 編輯推噓3(301)
留言4則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
The Trash-Site Safety Council has recently conducted a statewide study of possible harmful effects of garbage sites on the health of people living near the sites. A total of five sites and 300 people were examined. The study revealed, on average, only a small statistical correlation between the proximity of homes to garbage sites and the incidence of unexplained rashes among people living in these homes. Furthermore, although it is true that people living near the largest trash sites had a slightly higher incidence of the rashes, there was otherwise no correlation between the size of the garbage sites and people's health. Therefore, the council is pleased to announce that the current system of garbage sites does not pose a significant health hazard. We see no need to restrict the size of such sites in our state or to place any restrictions on the number of homes built near the sites. 請問各位強者版眾>"<... 雖然看的懂本篇文章 ...後來又看了一遍別人翻的中文 還是不太了解攻擊的論點在哪裡??? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 125.229.91.185

04/28 18:56, , 1F
稍看了一下 rash 後來用health hazard 偷渡
04/28 18:56, 1F

04/28 18:57, , 2F
還有樣本 抽樣方法 可以質疑
04/28 18:57, 2F

04/28 19:32, , 3F
凡有數據必有漏洞...還有另有他因最好寫
04/28 19:32, 3F

05/03 04:08, , 4F
建議你看一下Argue的「七宗罪」,很快就可以找出問題
05/03 04:08, 4F
文章代碼(AID): #19zjIhd- (GRE)
文章代碼(AID): #19zjIhd- (GRE)